Early versus late ultrasound and MRI fetal imaging for predicting outcomes in left‐sided congenital diaphragmatic hernia

Abstract Introduction Prenatal ultrasound (US) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) prognostic measurements are routinely used to predict congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) severity. Practice variability exists in the type and timing of measurements obtained. The primary objective of this study was to determine the best prenatal prognostic measures to predict the need for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). Similarly, the secondary objective was to determine which measures best predicted a variety of other neonatal outcomes. Methods This is a retrospective study of left‐sided CDH affected pregnancies at a single fetal care center from 2013 to 2023 who had at least one US and MRI. The cohort was divided into early (24 week) and late (34 week) groups, based on gestational age at the time of evaluation. Lung‐to‐head ratio (LHR), observed‐to‐expected LHR (O/E LHR), O/E total lung volume, and percent predicted lung volume (PPLV) were obtained at each visit. Clinical data were obtained from the electronic medical record. Pregnancies with other major anomalies, genetic syndromes, and <32 weeks gestation at the time of delivery were excluded. To identify the prenatal measures most predictive of ECMO, logistic regression models were estimated using standardized measures as covariates, and the standardized odds ratios were compared across measures. Following the identification of the strongest predictive measure for each imaging modality, each measure from both timepoints was included in one model to identify the best time (early vs. late) for outcome prediction. Results Of the 124 patients affected with CDH, 90 met inclusion criteria. 11 out of the 90 neonates did not survive to discharge (12.2%). Patients on ECMO were more likely to be female (59% p = 0.034) and have lower birthweight (2810 [413] vs. 3080 [483], p = 0.014). All prenatal measures between MRI and US were significantly associated with ECMO use; however, MRI PPLV and US O/E LHR at the late evaluation had the strongest association. Conclusion In this cohort of left‐sided CDH, all prenatal prognostic measures by US and MRI were highly predictive of ECMO use. O/E LHR by US and PPLV by MRI were the best predictors of ECMO in newborns, and these were most predictive in late gestational age.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Pregnancy
Published
2025-09-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/pmf2.70119
Primary Topic
Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Early versus late ultrasound and MRI fetal imaging for predicting outcomes in left‐sided congenital diaphragmatic hernia

Lamia Alamri, S. Christopher Derderian, Mary D. Sammel, Michael V. Zaretsky et al.
Pregnancy
Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia Studies
article

Early versus late ultrasound and MRI fetal imaging for predicting outcomes in left‐sided congenital diaphragmatic hernia

Lamia Alamri, S. Christopher Derderian, Mary D. Sammel, Michael V. Zaretsky, Henry L. Galan, Jason Gien, Mariana L. Meyers, L Kaizer
article en

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Prenatal ultrasound (US) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) prognostic measurements are routinely used to predict congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) severity. Practice variability exists in the type and timing of measurements obtained. The primary objective of this study was to determine the best prenatal prognostic measures to predict the need for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). Similarly, the secondary objective was to determine which measures best predicted a variety of other neonatal outcomes. Methods This is a retrospective study of left‐sided CDH affected pregnancies at a single fetal care center from 2013 to 2023 who had at least one US and MRI. The cohort was divided into early (24 week) and late (34 week) groups, based on gestational age at the time of evaluation. Lung‐to‐head ratio (LHR), observed‐to‐expected LHR (O/E LHR), O/E total lung volume, and percent predicted lung volume (PPLV) were obtained at each visit. Clinical data were obtained from the electronic medical record. Pregnancies with other major anomalies, genetic syndromes, and <32 weeks gestation at the time of delivery were excluded. To identify the prenatal measures most predictive of ECMO, logistic regression models were estimated using standardized measures as covariates, and the standardized odds ratios were compared across measures. Following the identification of the strongest predictive measure for each imaging modality, each measure from both timepoints was included in one model to identify the best time (early vs. late) for outcome prediction. Results Of the 124 patients affected with CDH, 90 met inclusion criteria. 11 out of the 90 neonates did not survive to discharge (12.2%). Patients on ECMO were more likely to be female (59% p = 0.034) and have lower birthweight (2810 [413] vs. 3080 [483], p = 0.014). All prenatal measures between MRI and US were significantly associated with ECMO use; however, MRI PPLV and US O/E LHR at the late evaluation had the strongest association. Conclusion In this cohort of left‐sided CDH, all prenatal prognostic measures by US and MRI were highly predictive of ECMO use. O/E LHR by US and PPLV by MRI were the best predictors of ECMO in newborns, and these were most predictive in late gestational age.

PregnancyVol. 1(6)
Colorado School of Public Health (US), Children's Hospital Colorado (US), University of Colorado Denver (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.