The Premodernity of Modernity. Kojève’s Reading of Bayle

In this article I reconstruct Alexandre Kojève’s interpretation of Pierre Bayle based on his various writings on this subject, most of which are still unpublished. In the introduction I briefly present the history and current editorial situation of each of them. In the first section I analyze some of Kojève’s manuscripts to give an initial account of his position on Bayle’s concept of tolerance. In the second section I outline Kojève’s epistemological argumentation in his book on Bayle. In the third section I rely on Kojève’s notes for his 1936-1937 lectures on Bayle to argue that his position actually differs from both Bayle’s skepticism and political liberalism. Rather, for Kojève, Bayle’s philosophical impasse results from his transitional position in the movement toward a “modern” worldview first consistently produced by Hegel and Marx, implying the idea of a purely historical human truth realized in – and imposed by – the “post-revolutionary” state.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
DoisPontos
Published
2025-09-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5380/dp.v22i1.98665
Primary Topic
Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Premodernity of Modernity. Kojève’s Reading of Bayle

Giovanni Zanotti
DoisPontos
Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought
article

The Premodernity of Modernity. Kojève’s Reading of Bayle

Giovanni Zanotti
article en

Abstract

In this article I reconstruct Alexandre Kojève’s interpretation of Pierre Bayle based on his various writings on this subject, most of which are still unpublished. In the introduction I briefly present the history and current editorial situation of each of them. In the first section I analyze some of Kojève’s manuscripts to give an initial account of his position on Bayle’s concept of tolerance. In the second section I outline Kojève’s epistemological argumentation in his book on Bayle. In the third section I rely on Kojève’s notes for his 1936-1937 lectures on Bayle to argue that his position actually differs from both Bayle’s skepticism and political liberalism. Rather, for Kojève, Bayle’s philosophical impasse results from his transitional position in the movement toward a “modern” worldview first consistently produced by Hegel and Marx, implying the idea of a purely historical human truth realized in – and imposed by – the “post-revolutionary” state.

DoisPontosVol. 22(1)
University of Coimbra (PT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Premodernity of Modernity. Kojève’s Reading of Bayle — Giovanni Zanotti · DoisPontos (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS