Development and validation of the AIDS scale among the system of quality of life instruments for chronic diseases (QLICD-HIV V2.0)

In recent years, the prevalence of AIDS has shown a high increase, which has become a major public health problem of international concern. According to research, the quality of life(QoL) of AIDS patients is often lower than that of patients with other chronic diseases, so how to improve the QoL of AIDS patients has become a problem that needs to be urgently focused on at present. The purpose of this study is to develop and validate the AIDS scale among the System of Quality of Life Instruments for Chronic Diseases(QLICD), name as QLICD-HIV V2.0. QLICD-HIV V2.0 was developed using a programmed modular approach with multiple nominal and focus group discussions, in-depth interviews and quantitative statistical procedures. Pre-surveys and formal surveys were conducted on the preliminary version of the scale, thus completing the scale development and validation process. The reliability of the scale was analyzed using the correlation coefficient method, the variability method, and the Cronbach’s α coefficient method of classical test theory(CTT), the validity of the scale was analyzed using factor analysis and correlation analysis with the SF-36 as a criterion, and the responsiveness of the scale and of each domain/facet was assessed through paired t-tests of before and after admission scores, and calculation of the standardized response mean (SRM). QLICD-HIV V2.0 ultimately retained 43 items, resulting in a structure of 4 domains, subdivided into 12 facets. The scale was shown to have high reliability overall by several methods of CTT. The Cronbach’s α coefficient and test-retest reliability for the total scale were 0.90 and 0.88, respectively, with domain Cronbach’s α coefficient ranging from 0.74 to 0.85 and test-retest reliabilities ranging from 0.69 to 0.89. Factor analysis results showed KMO = 0.852, with three common factors extracted from 15 items of the specific module, accounting for 55.2% of the cumulative variance, and correlation and factor analyses confirmed good structural and criterion-related validity. QLICD-HIV V2.0 was developed in a systematic and scientific way, and showed good reliability and validity after preliminary application, which can be further promoted and used as a new QoL scale for AIDS patients with Chinese characteristics.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Infectious Diseases
Published
2025-09-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-025-11613-y
Primary Topic
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development and validation of the AIDS scale among the system of quality of life instruments for chronic diseases (QLICD-HIV V2.0)

Xiaoyuan Sun, Chonghua Wan, Haifeng Ding, Ying Chen et al.
BMC Infectious Diseases
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
article

Development and validation of the AIDS scale among the system of quality of life instruments for chronic diseases (QLICD-HIV V2.0)

Xiaoyuan Sun, Chonghua Wan, Haifeng Ding, Ying Chen, Liyuan Qiao, Jianming Jiang
article en

Abstract

In recent years, the prevalence of AIDS has shown a high increase, which has become a major public health problem of international concern. According to research, the quality of life(QoL) of AIDS patients is often lower than that of patients with other chronic diseases, so how to improve the QoL of AIDS patients has become a problem that needs to be urgently focused on at present. The purpose of this study is to develop and validate the AIDS scale among the System of Quality of Life Instruments for Chronic Diseases(QLICD), name as QLICD-HIV V2.0. QLICD-HIV V2.0 was developed using a programmed modular approach with multiple nominal and focus group discussions, in-depth interviews and quantitative statistical procedures. Pre-surveys and formal surveys were conducted on the preliminary version of the scale, thus completing the scale development and validation process. The reliability of the scale was analyzed using the correlation coefficient method, the variability method, and the Cronbach’s α coefficient method of classical test theory(CTT), the validity of the scale was analyzed using factor analysis and correlation analysis with the SF-36 as a criterion, and the responsiveness of the scale and of each domain/facet was assessed through paired t-tests of before and after admission scores, and calculation of the standardized response mean (SRM). QLICD-HIV V2.0 ultimately retained 43 items, resulting in a structure of 4 domains, subdivided into 12 facets. The scale was shown to have high reliability overall by several methods of CTT. The Cronbach’s α coefficient and test-retest reliability for the total scale were 0.90 and 0.88, respectively, with domain Cronbach’s α coefficient ranging from 0.74 to 0.85 and test-retest reliabilities ranging from 0.69 to 0.89. Factor analysis results showed KMO = 0.852, with three common factors extracted from 15 items of the specific module, accounting for 55.2% of the cumulative variance, and correlation and factor analyses confirmed good structural and criterion-related validity. QLICD-HIV V2.0 was developed in a systematic and scientific way, and showed good reliability and validity after preliminary application, which can be further promoted and used as a new QoL scale for AIDS patients with Chinese characteristics.

BMC Infectious DiseasesVol. 25(1)
Guangdong Medical College (CN), Kunming Medical University (CN), Cal Humanities (US), Fourth People’s Hospital of Jinan (CN), Dongguan People’s Hospital (CN), Jinan City People's Hospital (CN), Shandong First Medical University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation of Guangdong Province
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.