Assessing the validity of ChatGPT-4o and Google Gemini Advanced when responding to frequently asked questions in endodontics
ChatGPT-4o and GGA responses showed high validity under lenient criteria that significantly decreased under stricter thresholds, limiting their reliability as a stand-alone source of information in endodontics. While AI chatbots show promise to improve patient education in endodontics, their validity limitations under rigorous evaluation highlight the need for careful professional monitoring.
Authors
- Fernando Peña‐Bengoa (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9389-0468)
- P. M. H. Dummer (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0726-7467)
- Nicolás Dufey-Portilla (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5922-2757)
- Chantal Avila (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1753-5549)
- Francesc Abella Sans (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3500-3039)
- Marc García‐Font (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1280-9611)
- Venkateshbabu Nagendrababu (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3783-3156)
- Ana Billik Frisman
- Maximiliano Gallardo Robles
Institutions
- University of Sharjah (AE)
- Universidad Autónoma de Chile (CL)
- Universitat Internacional de Catalunya (ES)
- Universidad Andrés Bello (CL)
- Cardiff University (GB)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Journal of Applied Oral Science
- Published
- 2025-01-01
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-7757-2025-0321
- Primary Topic
- Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00