How Curiosity Killed Humankind: A Critical Reflection on the Trajectory of Artificial Intelligence

This paper explores the implications of artificial intelligence (AI) development for humanity at large in a long-term perspective, warning against a trajectory in which foundational insights into how humans learn and acquire knowledge are eclipsed by a misplaced belief in the speed and ease with which human nature can be transformed. If the meta-level questions raised by AI are not addressed with careful consideration of existing epistemological frameworks—but instead guided by utopian visions of technological progress—we risk a degeneration of human intellect and the emergence of a dystopian future. The paper argues that although curiosity has historically been a driving force behind human advancement, the uncritical pursuit of AI may ultimately erode the foundations of human agency, creativity, and social cohesion. The paper examines the trajectory of Artificial intelligence through a four stage framework: the stages of Confusion, Escalation, Redistribution, and Degeneration.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nordic Machine Intelligence
Published
2025-09-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5617/nmi.12597
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How Curiosity Killed Humankind: A Critical Reflection on the Trajectory of Artificial Intelligence

Einar Bratteng
Nordic Machine Intelligence
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

How Curiosity Killed Humankind: A Critical Reflection on the Trajectory of Artificial Intelligence

Einar Bratteng
article en

Abstract

This paper explores the implications of artificial intelligence (AI) development for humanity at large in a long-term perspective, warning against a trajectory in which foundational insights into how humans learn and acquire knowledge are eclipsed by a misplaced belief in the speed and ease with which human nature can be transformed. If the meta-level questions raised by AI are not addressed with careful consideration of existing epistemological frameworks—but instead guided by utopian visions of technological progress—we risk a degeneration of human intellect and the emergence of a dystopian future. The paper argues that although curiosity has historically been a driving force behind human advancement, the uncritical pursuit of AI may ultimately erode the foundations of human agency, creativity, and social cohesion. The paper examines the trajectory of Artificial intelligence through a four stage framework: the stages of Confusion, Escalation, Redistribution, and Degeneration.

Nordic Machine IntelligenceVol. 5(1)
Norwegian University of Life Sciences (NO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.