Assessing pesticide handling practices and predictors among farm workers in Awi zonal administration using health belief model

Pesticides are essential for controlling pests and enhancing agricultural productivity; however, their misuse poses significant health risks to rural farm workers, particularly in low and middle-income countries (LMIC). This study explores the factors influencing farmers' intentions to adopt safe pesticide handling practices in Awi Zone of northwest Ethiopia, utilizing the Health Belief Model (HBM) as a framework. A community-based cross-sectional study was conducted from September to October 2024 in Awi Zone, involving 603 participants selected through multistage sampling. Data were collected using the KoboCollect toolbox and exported to SPSS version-23 for analysis. Both bi-variable and multivariable logistic regression analyses performed to identify factors related to pesticide handling practices, and we are Implemented the (HBM) to evaluate behavioral influences on farmers' intentions to adopt safe pesticide handling practices. The study found that 40.6% of farm workers were practice safe handling of pesticide. The factors included education level, with farmers who had primary education or higher being 1.97 times more likely to practice safe handling (OR = 1.97, 95% CI (1.33, 2.9)) compared to illiterate farmers. Those with easy access to safety materials were 1.82 times more likely to practice safe handling (OR = 1.82, 95% CI (1.24, 2.67)). Additionally, farm workers participating in workshops were also 1.97 times more likely to practice safe handling (OR = 1.97, 95% CI (1.33, 2.9)), and those with good knowledge were 1.73 times more likely to do so (OR = 1.73, 95% CI (1.2, 2.5)) from their counterparts. Moreover, HBM components were significant predictors of farm workers intention on safe handling practice. From this, Perceived benefit and cue to action had positive whereas perceived barrier had a negative relation with their intention. Safe handling practices among farmers in the study area were found to be low. Thus, it is crucial to emphasize education and training, ensure easy access to safety materials, and enhance knowledge to promote safe practices. Additionally, focusing on perceived benefits and cues to action while addressing perceived barriers, as per the Health Belief Model, is essential. Targeted interventions and regulatory enhancements are necessary for effectively improving safety practices among farmers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-09-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-09135-3
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Pesticide Exposure and Toxicity
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.50
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing pesticide handling practices and predictors among farm workers in Awi zonal administration using health belief model

Chalachew Yenew, Meron Asmamaw Alemayehu, Gashaw Melkie Bayeh, Getasew Yirdaw et al.
2 citations
Scientific Reports
Pesticide Exposure and Toxicity
3.50
article

Assessing pesticide handling practices and predictors among farm workers in Awi zonal administration using health belief model

Chalachew Yenew, Meron Asmamaw Alemayehu, Gashaw Melkie Bayeh, Getasew Yirdaw, Abebaw Molla, Tilahun Degu Tsega, Berhanu Abebaw Mekonnen, Sintayehu Simie Tsega, Getaneh Atikilt Yemata, Abathun Temesgen, Amare Genetu Ejigu, Habitamu Mekonen, Almaw Genet Yeshiwas, Ahmed Fentaw Ahmed, Rahel Mulatie Anteneh, Asaye Alamneh Gebeyehu, Anley Shiferaw Enawgaw, Zeamanuel Anteneh Yigzaw, Yehizbalem Azmeraw
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Pesticides are essential for controlling pests and enhancing agricultural productivity; however, their misuse poses significant health risks to rural farm workers, particularly in low and middle-income countries (LMIC). This study explores the factors influencing farmers' intentions to adopt safe pesticide handling practices in Awi Zone of northwest Ethiopia, utilizing the Health Belief Model (HBM) as a framework. A community-based cross-sectional study was conducted from September to October 2024 in Awi Zone, involving 603 participants selected through multistage sampling. Data were collected using the KoboCollect toolbox and exported to SPSS version-23 for analysis. Both bi-variable and multivariable logistic regression analyses performed to identify factors related to pesticide handling practices, and we are Implemented the (HBM) to evaluate behavioral influences on farmers' intentions to adopt safe pesticide handling practices. The study found that 40.6% of farm workers were practice safe handling of pesticide. The factors included education level, with farmers who had primary education or higher being 1.97 times more likely to practice safe handling (OR = 1.97, 95% CI (1.33, 2.9)) compared to illiterate farmers. Those with easy access to safety materials were 1.82 times more likely to practice safe handling (OR = 1.82, 95% CI (1.24, 2.67)). Additionally, farm workers participating in workshops were also 1.97 times more likely to practice safe handling (OR = 1.97, 95% CI (1.33, 2.9)), and those with good knowledge were 1.73 times more likely to do so (OR = 1.73, 95% CI (1.2, 2.5)) from their counterparts. Moreover, HBM components were significant predictors of farm workers intention on safe handling practice. From this, Perceived benefit and cue to action had positive whereas perceived barrier had a negative relation with their intention. Safe handling practices among farmers in the study area were found to be low. Thus, it is crucial to emphasize education and training, ensure easy access to safety materials, and enhance knowledge to promote safe practices. Additionally, focusing on perceived benefits and cues to action while addressing perceived barriers, as per the Health Belief Model, is essential. Targeted interventions and regulatory enhancements are necessary for effectively improving safety practices among farmers.

Scientific ReportsVol. 15(1)
Indiana University Health (US), Debre Tabor University (ET), Jigjiga University (ET), Injibara University (ET), Bahir Dar University (ET), University of Gondar (ET), Debre Markos University (ET)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Pesticide Exposure and Toxicity
3.50
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.