Disentangling climate and policy uncertainties for the Colorado River post-2026 operations

Lakes Mead and Powell in the Colorado River Basin underpin water and hydropower supply for the western United States. While the policies currently regulating the basin will expire by 2026, planning remains challenging due to intertwined climate variability and policy uncertainties. Based on streamflow projections from 10 dynamically downscaled CMIP6 global climate models and unique methods that add and remove internal variability, we evaluate future conditions at Powell and Mead under existing and alternative policies. Due to projected streamflow declines, under existing policy, both reservoirs will face substantial risks (>80% likelihood) of reaching dead pool before 2060. Adopting recently proposed alternative policies reduces but doesn't eliminate such risks. All policies also exhibit tipping points where reservoir levels can change rapidly with a slight change in streamflow. A sustainable policy may require larger reductions to further reduce the reservoirs' dead pool risks and provide better buffers from sudden changes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nature Communications
Published
2025-09-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-63635-4
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.63

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Disentangling climate and policy uncertainties for the Colorado River post-2026 operations

Alex D. Hall, Stefan Rahimi, Bowen Wang, Benjamin Bass et al.
2 citations
Nature Communications
Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
1.63
article

Disentangling climate and policy uncertainties for the Colorado River post-2026 operations

Alex D. Hall, Stefan Rahimi, Bowen Wang, Benjamin Bass, Lei Huang
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Lakes Mead and Powell in the Colorado River Basin underpin water and hydropower supply for the western United States. While the policies currently regulating the basin will expire by 2026, planning remains challenging due to intertwined climate variability and policy uncertainties. Based on streamflow projections from 10 dynamically downscaled CMIP6 global climate models and unique methods that add and remove internal variability, we evaluate future conditions at Powell and Mead under existing and alternative policies. Due to projected streamflow declines, under existing policy, both reservoirs will face substantial risks (>80% likelihood) of reaching dead pool before 2060. Adopting recently proposed alternative policies reduces but doesn't eliminate such risks. All policies also exhibit tipping points where reservoir levels can change rapidly with a slight change in streamflow. A sustainable policy may require larger reductions to further reduce the reservoirs' dead pool risks and provide better buffers from sudden changes.

Nature CommunicationsVol. 16(1)
University of Wyoming (US), University of California, Los Angeles (US), Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
U.S. Department of Energy, U.S. Department of Commerce, California Energy Commission, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Bureau of Reclamation
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
1.63
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Disentangling climate and policy uncertainties for the Colorado River post-2026 operations — Alex D. Hall, Stefan Rahimi, et al. · Nature Communications (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS