An effective study on the diagnosis of colon cancer with the developed local binary pattern method

Global cancer statistics indicate colon cancer caused nearly 1 million deaths, with lung cancer accounting for approximately 2 million fatalities<sup>1</sup>. Accurate tumor identification is a critical diagnostic challenge, where histopathological examination serves as the gold standard. While current pathological localization techniques are reliable, they possess procedural limitations. This study focuses on nuclear detection and classification via pathological imaging to determine tumor presence and characterize behavior. We introduce Cross-Over LBP (CO-LBP), an innovative Local Binary Pattern variant for colon cancer diagnosis, and conduct a comparative analysis with the established step-LBP (n-LBP) method. Our evaluation framework incorporates machine learning algorithms and transfer learning techniques applied to histopathological images from the LC25000 dataset. Results demonstrate CO-LBP's clinically competitive performance (94.57% accuracy, 90.91% kappa), while n-LBP yields superior diagnostic outcomes (96.87% accuracy, 93.74% kappa), highlighting their complementary strengths in texture-based feature extraction. The experimental protocol first evaluated both LBP variants with machine learning classifiers, then with transfer learning models. The LC25000 dataset, comprising colon tissue histopathological images, served as the benchmark. Quantitative analysis revealed the following performance for n-LBP: accuracy (96.87%), kappa (93.74%), precision (96.9%), recall (96.9%), F1 score (96.9%), and ROC (99.4%). CO-LBP achieved comparable. Results accuracy (94.57%), kappa (90.91%), precision (94.9%), recall (94.9%), F1 score (94.9%), and ROC (98.8%). These findings substantiate the diagnostic potential of both methods, illustrating their distinct performance characteristics.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-09-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-18145-0
Citations
1
Primary Topic
AI in cancer detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.48
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An effective study on the diagnosis of colon cancer with the developed local binary pattern method

Mehmet Gül
1 citations
Scientific Reports
AI in cancer detection
2.48
article

An effective study on the diagnosis of colon cancer with the developed local binary pattern method

Mehmet Gül
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Global cancer statistics indicate colon cancer caused nearly 1 million deaths, with lung cancer accounting for approximately 2 million fatalities<sup>1</sup>. Accurate tumor identification is a critical diagnostic challenge, where histopathological examination serves as the gold standard. While current pathological localization techniques are reliable, they possess procedural limitations. This study focuses on nuclear detection and classification via pathological imaging to determine tumor presence and characterize behavior. We introduce Cross-Over LBP (CO-LBP), an innovative Local Binary Pattern variant for colon cancer diagnosis, and conduct a comparative analysis with the established step-LBP (n-LBP) method. Our evaluation framework incorporates machine learning algorithms and transfer learning techniques applied to histopathological images from the LC25000 dataset. Results demonstrate CO-LBP's clinically competitive performance (94.57% accuracy, 90.91% kappa), while n-LBP yields superior diagnostic outcomes (96.87% accuracy, 93.74% kappa), highlighting their complementary strengths in texture-based feature extraction. The experimental protocol first evaluated both LBP variants with machine learning classifiers, then with transfer learning models. The LC25000 dataset, comprising colon tissue histopathological images, served as the benchmark. Quantitative analysis revealed the following performance for n-LBP: accuracy (96.87%), kappa (93.74%), precision (96.9%), recall (96.9%), F1 score (96.9%), and ROC (99.4%). CO-LBP achieved comparable. Results accuracy (94.57%), kappa (90.91%), precision (94.9%), recall (94.9%), F1 score (94.9%), and ROC (98.8%). These findings substantiate the diagnostic potential of both methods, illustrating their distinct performance characteristics.

Scientific ReportsVol. 15(1)
Usak University (TR), Şırnak University (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
AI in cancer detection
2.48
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

An effective study on the diagnosis of colon cancer with the developed local binary pattern method — Mehmet Gül · Scientific Reports (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS