From Everyday Leadership to Solution-Focused Conversations – a Microanalysis of the Change in Interactive Functions in Training Supportive Leadership Conversations

Building on De Jong et al. (2020) and Bavelas et al. (2017), this study examines how a three-day solution-focused (SF) leadership training influences the interactive functions in supportive leadership conversations. While SF principles are widely used in therapy and coaching, their impact on everyday leadership interactions has received less attention. Using Microanalysis of Face-to-Face Dialogue, we analysed six supportive leadership conversations—three before and three after the training. Each utterance was coded based on the 15 interactive functions identified by Bavelas et al. (2017). Our findings show that leaders asked more questions (requesting), listened more attentively (attending), and contributed less content after the training, while conversation partners contributed more and attended less. These shifts align with SF principles. Comparisons with prior studies of De Jong et al. (2020) and Bavelas et al. (2017) confirm that asymmetry in interactive functions—one interlocutor mainly asking and attending, the other contributing—is a typical feature of SF dialogues. This pattern also emerged in our supportive leadership conversations after SF training. Despite individual variation, the shift in our data supports the idea that SF dialogues foster a purposeful reconfiguration of interactional functions. Further research should explore long-term effects, contextual factors, and the integration of SF principles across broader leadership practices.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of solution-focused brief therapy
Published
2025-09-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.59874/001c.144130
Primary Topic
Language, Metaphor, and Cognition
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From Everyday Leadership to Solution-Focused Conversations – a Microanalysis of the Change in Interactive Functions in Training Supportive Leadership Conversations

Elfie J Czerny, Dominik Godat
Journal of solution-focused brief therapy
Language, Metaphor, and Cognition
article

From Everyday Leadership to Solution-Focused Conversations – a Microanalysis of the Change in Interactive Functions in Training Supportive Leadership Conversations

Elfie J Czerny, Dominik Godat
article en

Abstract

Building on De Jong et al. (2020) and Bavelas et al. (2017), this study examines how a three-day solution-focused (SF) leadership training influences the interactive functions in supportive leadership conversations. While SF principles are widely used in therapy and coaching, their impact on everyday leadership interactions has received less attention. Using Microanalysis of Face-to-Face Dialogue, we analysed six supportive leadership conversations—three before and three after the training. Each utterance was coded based on the 15 interactive functions identified by Bavelas et al. (2017). Our findings show that leaders asked more questions (requesting), listened more attentively (attending), and contributed less content after the training, while conversation partners contributed more and attended less. These shifts align with SF principles. Comparisons with prior studies of De Jong et al. (2020) and Bavelas et al. (2017) confirm that asymmetry in interactive functions—one interlocutor mainly asking and attending, the other contributing—is a typical feature of SF dialogues. This pattern also emerged in our supportive leadership conversations after SF training. Despite individual variation, the shift in our data supports the idea that SF dialogues foster a purposeful reconfiguration of interactional functions. Further research should explore long-term effects, contextual factors, and the integration of SF principles across broader leadership practices.

Journal of solution-focused brief therapyVol. 9(2)
Lucerne University of Applied Sciences and Arts (CH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Language, Metaphor, and Cognition
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.