Deep Parenchymal Steatosis Assessment and Quantification in Histopathology

Manual annotation of liver biopsies is time-consuming, prone to human error, and suffers from high inter-observer variability. Automated algorithms for classifying metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH) in liver transplants can improve accuracy, speed, and consistency in diagnosing hepatic steatosis. This study presents a hybrid approach that combines image processing, machine learning, and deep learning for steatosis classification, leveraging state-of-the-art segmentation models. The first step involves deep learning based segmentation models to obtain histological tissue detection. Next, Gabor kernels are applied, followed by an adaptive color deconvolution to separate hematoxylin and eosin channels, along with the Macenko method for extended steatosis detection. Then, the macrosteatosis quantification is done using various segmentation models. Microsteatosis cleaning is performed to reject false positives in microsteatosis with techniques such as logistic regression, one-class SVM, and Isolation Forest. The algorithm is developed and tested on 385 H&E-stained liver images obtained from 77 donors. It demonstrated improved performance in both tissue and steatosis detection, showing an overall accuracy of 0.54% higher and a remarkable 5.03% increase in F1 score as compared to the state-of-the-art HEPASS algorithm. The performance of the proposed model on another public dataset shows an improvement of over 3% in accuracy across all the sets.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IEEE Access
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2025.3615832
Primary Topic
Molecular Biology Techniques and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Deep Parenchymal Steatosis Assessment and Quantification in Histopathology

Apurba Chakraborty, Ravi Gupta, Parth J. Parekh, Manish Bhatt et al.
IEEE Access
Molecular Biology Techniques and Applications
article

Deep Parenchymal Steatosis Assessment and Quantification in Histopathology

Apurba Chakraborty, Ravi Gupta, Parth J. Parekh, Manish Bhatt, Phidakordor Sahshong, Amit Nagora
article en

Abstract

Manual annotation of liver biopsies is time-consuming, prone to human error, and suffers from high inter-observer variability. Automated algorithms for classifying metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH) in liver transplants can improve accuracy, speed, and consistency in diagnosing hepatic steatosis. This study presents a hybrid approach that combines image processing, machine learning, and deep learning for steatosis classification, leveraging state-of-the-art segmentation models. The first step involves deep learning based segmentation models to obtain histological tissue detection. Next, Gabor kernels are applied, followed by an adaptive color deconvolution to separate hematoxylin and eosin channels, along with the Macenko method for extended steatosis detection. Then, the macrosteatosis quantification is done using various segmentation models. Microsteatosis cleaning is performed to reject false positives in microsteatosis with techniques such as logistic regression, one-class SVM, and Isolation Forest. The algorithm is developed and tested on 385 H&E-stained liver images obtained from 77 donors. It demonstrated improved performance in both tissue and steatosis detection, showing an overall accuracy of 0.54% higher and a remarkable 5.03% increase in F1 score as compared to the state-of-the-art HEPASS algorithm. The performance of the proposed model on another public dataset shows an improvement of over 3% in accuracy across all the sets.

IEEE AccessVol. 13
Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati (IN), Birla Institute of Technology and Science, Pilani - Goa Campus (IN), Birla Institute of Technology and Science, Pilani (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Molecular Biology Techniques and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.