Reimagining Public Participation in Urban Development: Insights from Bramfischerville, Johannesburg

This paper examines how residents of Bramfischerville, an underprivileged area in Johannesburg, South Africa, perceive public participation in urban development. Drawing on eight months of fieldwork, including six group interviews, a baseline survey ( n = 502), and twenty-three key informant interviews, it contrasts residents’ understandings with conventional interpretations in urban affairs literature. The findings reveal that for residents of Bramfischerville, participation is less about influencing policy and more about gaining recognition and building relationships. Participation is seen as both state-invited and community-initiated, fostering ongoing dialogue through diverse forms of interaction. These culturally and contextually grounded conceptualizations challenge dominant theories that frame participation as a state-led process with predefined roles for the public. The paper argues for reimagining participation theory through the lens of situated knowledge and lived experience, highlighting the need to account for multiple, locally embedded understandings of participation in urban development.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Urban Affairs Review
Published
2025-09-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10780874251380148
Primary Topic
Urban and Rural Development Challenges
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reimagining Public Participation in Urban Development: Insights from Bramfischerville, Johannesburg

Katrin Hofer
Urban Affairs Review
Urban and Rural Development Challenges
article

Reimagining Public Participation in Urban Development: Insights from Bramfischerville, Johannesburg

Katrin Hofer
article en

Abstract

This paper examines how residents of Bramfischerville, an underprivileged area in Johannesburg, South Africa, perceive public participation in urban development. Drawing on eight months of fieldwork, including six group interviews, a baseline survey ( n = 502), and twenty-three key informant interviews, it contrasts residents’ understandings with conventional interpretations in urban affairs literature. The findings reveal that for residents of Bramfischerville, participation is less about influencing policy and more about gaining recognition and building relationships. Participation is seen as both state-invited and community-initiated, fostering ongoing dialogue through diverse forms of interaction. These culturally and contextually grounded conceptualizations challenge dominant theories that frame participation as a state-led process with predefined roles for the public. The paper argues for reimagining participation theory through the lens of situated knowledge and lived experience, highlighting the need to account for multiple, locally embedded understandings of participation in urban development.

Urban Affairs ReviewVol. 62(2)
Institute of Urban and Regional Development (PL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Urban and Rural Development Challenges
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.