Digital piety and soft control in Indonesia

Indonesia's digital sphere is increasingly shaped by a convergence of moral governance, algorithmic control, and populist nationalism. While formally democratic, the state now governs online life through soft authoritarian practices that are moralised and normalised. This commentary examines how digital moralism grounded in Pancasila ideology underpins laws like the Electronic Information and Transactions Law, the draft Broadcasting Bill, and recent practices of removing online content. Rather than employing explicit censorship, these laws invoke religious values, national heritage, and social solidarity in defence of digital regulation. Buzzers reinforce this moral frame by portraying dissent as a threat to public virtue. In contrast to coercive models seen in China or Russia, Indonesia's approach builds legitimacy through culturally embedded narratives of protection and decency. By unpacking Indonesia's model of digital piety, this commentary offers a Global South perspective on how democratic backsliding can unfold through values-based governance, making repression appear lawful, familiar, and even morally justified.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Dialogues on Digital Society
Published
2025-09-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/29768640251382646
Primary Topic
E-Government and Public Services
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Digital piety and soft control in Indonesia

Azry Almi Kaloko
Dialogues on Digital Society
E-Government and Public Services
article

Digital piety and soft control in Indonesia

Azry Almi Kaloko
article en

Abstract

Indonesia's digital sphere is increasingly shaped by a convergence of moral governance, algorithmic control, and populist nationalism. While formally democratic, the state now governs online life through soft authoritarian practices that are moralised and normalised. This commentary examines how digital moralism grounded in Pancasila ideology underpins laws like the Electronic Information and Transactions Law, the draft Broadcasting Bill, and recent practices of removing online content. Rather than employing explicit censorship, these laws invoke religious values, national heritage, and social solidarity in defence of digital regulation. Buzzers reinforce this moral frame by portraying dissent as a threat to public virtue. In contrast to coercive models seen in China or Russia, Indonesia's approach builds legitimacy through culturally embedded narratives of protection and decency. By unpacking Indonesia's model of digital piety, this commentary offers a Global South perspective on how democratic backsliding can unfold through values-based governance, making repression appear lawful, familiar, and even morally justified.

Dialogues on Digital SocietyVol. 1(3)
Office of International Affairs (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
E-Government and Public Services
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Digital piety and soft control in Indonesia — Azry Almi Kaloko · Dialogues on Digital Society (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS