Observational studies of early versus late salvage therapies in critical care exhibit intrinsic selection bias: two meta-analyses
There were significant differences in the results of observational and experimental studies looking at timing of salvage therapies, partly due to selection bias in observational studies. This issue was worsened by only including subjects who receive the therapy. Randomized trials using objective eligibility criteria remain the best method to determine optimal timing of salvage therapies.
Authors
- Alexis Ogdie (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4639-0775)
- Christopher J. Yarnell (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5657-9398)
- Nadir Yehya (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2996-217X)
- Elizabeth Landzberg (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0142-4345)
- Michael O. Harhay
Institutions
- University Health Network (CA)
- Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (US)
- Emory University (US)
- University of Toronto (CA)
- Scarborough Health Network (CA)
- Children's Healthcare of Atlanta (US)
- Science History Institute (US)
- University of Pennsylvania (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Critical Care
- Published
- 2025-09-29
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-025-05663-6
- Citations
- 1
- Primary Topic
- Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 1.35