Contextual Moderations of Age and Status Inequalities in Access to Healthcare

The article analyzes the problem of social inequalities in access to healthcare services in different countries of the world, including Russia. In modern research, such a subjective indicator as unmet medical care needs has become widely used in order to measure these inequalities. In particular, it was found that with age this indicator decreases significantly, while in economically vulnerable groups the values increase. Such age and status inequalities manifest to various degrees of intensity in different countries. However the rare attempts to explain such differences between countries using contextual variables have yet not been successful. In order to clarify the situation, this study conducts two-level logistic hierarchical modeling using survey data collected in 26 countries of the world under the International Social Survey Program (ISSP 2021) and statistics characterizing these countries. The results confirm that in some countries there are clear age and status inequalities when it comes to unmet needs for healthcare services, while in others they are more ambiguous, and such differences in how inequalities manifest can be explained by contextual factors that differentiate countries in terms of economic and welfare state development, accessibility and quality of healthcare systems. In developed countries inequalities are more pronounced than in underdeveloped countries. In the former, attention to socially vulnerable groups is a likely reason for the significant improvement in access to healthcare for older age cohorts and the persistence of access restrictions at younger ages. At the same time when analyzing status inequalities it becomes clear that they are more pronounced in developed countries. This confirms the assumption about the greater gain in access to medical services for individuals with high social status in countries with more complete coverage of the population with high-quality medical services. Such differences in inequality are explained by contextual factors — the development of the economy and the welfare state, the availability and quality of healthcare systems. In developed countries, inequalities turned out to be more noticeable than in underdeveloped countries. As such, significant age differences reflect the advantages of older people in access to medical care compared to young people. Clear status inequalities in these countries indicate that with low social status a person has to deal with barriers when it comes to healthcare provision much more often than if they had been a person of higher status. In our country, restrictions in access to healthcare services turned out, according to the data we acquired, to be among the highest in the world.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sociological Journal
Published
2025-09-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.19181/socjour.2025.31.3.7
Primary Topic
Employment and Welfare Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Contextual Moderations of Age and Status Inequalities in Access to Healthcare

Нина Русинова, В В Сафронов
Sociological Journal
Employment and Welfare Studies
article

Contextual Moderations of Age and Status Inequalities in Access to Healthcare

Нина Русинова, В В Сафронов
article en

Abstract

The article analyzes the problem of social inequalities in access to healthcare services in different countries of the world, including Russia. In modern research, such a subjective indicator as unmet medical care needs has become widely used in order to measure these inequalities. In particular, it was found that with age this indicator decreases significantly, while in economically vulnerable groups the values increase. Such age and status inequalities manifest to various degrees of intensity in different countries. However the rare attempts to explain such differences between countries using contextual variables have yet not been successful. In order to clarify the situation, this study conducts two-level logistic hierarchical modeling using survey data collected in 26 countries of the world under the International Social Survey Program (ISSP 2021) and statistics characterizing these countries. The results confirm that in some countries there are clear age and status inequalities when it comes to unmet needs for healthcare services, while in others they are more ambiguous, and such differences in how inequalities manifest can be explained by contextual factors that differentiate countries in terms of economic and welfare state development, accessibility and quality of healthcare systems. In developed countries inequalities are more pronounced than in underdeveloped countries. In the former, attention to socially vulnerable groups is a likely reason for the significant improvement in access to healthcare for older age cohorts and the persistence of access restrictions at younger ages. At the same time when analyzing status inequalities it becomes clear that they are more pronounced in developed countries. This confirms the assumption about the greater gain in access to medical services for individuals with high social status in countries with more complete coverage of the population with high-quality medical services. Such differences in inequality are explained by contextual factors — the development of the economy and the welfare state, the availability and quality of healthcare systems. In developed countries, inequalities turned out to be more noticeable than in underdeveloped countries. As such, significant age differences reflect the advantages of older people in access to medical care compared to young people. Clear status inequalities in these countries indicate that with low social status a person has to deal with barriers when it comes to healthcare provision much more often than if they had been a person of higher status. In our country, restrictions in access to healthcare services turned out, according to the data we acquired, to be among the highest in the world.

Sociological JournalVol. 31(3)
Institute of Sociology (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Employment and Welfare Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.