External validity of cardiovascular risk assessment tools in individuals with MASLD (NAFLD): a cohort study

The present study was conducted to evaluate the external validity of various cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk assessment tools in predicting CVD events among individuals with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD). The Amol prospective cohort study spanned a follow-up period of seven years, from 2009 to 2010 to 2016-2017. A total of 1,431 individuals aged 40-75 years were included. The 10-year cardiovascular risk was estimated for each participant using four risk assessment tools: the Pooled Cohort Equations of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA), the Systematic Coronary Risk Evaluation (SCORE) equations, the Framingham General Cardiovascular Risk Profile, and the SCORE2 equations. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves were used to assess the discrimination ability of these tools. The ACC/AHA tool demonstrated the highest predictive ability for both fatal CVD events (AUC: 0.92, 95% CI: 0.88-0.97 for men; AUC: 0.87, 95% CI: 0.79-0.96 for women) and composite CVD events (AUC: 0.68, 95% CI: 0.62-0.75 for men; AUC: 0.79, 95% CI: 0.72-0.85 for women). Based on these findings, cardiovascular risk assessment tools, particularly the ACC/AHA tool, can be applied in clinical settings to evaluate the future risk of CVD events in women with MASLD. However, the SCORE equations also exhibited excellent predictive ability for fatal cardiac events, requiring fewer variables.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-09-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-07775-z
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.35

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

External validity of cardiovascular risk assessment tools in individuals with MASLD (NAFLD): a cohort study

Fahimeh Safarnezhad Tameshkel, Bahareh Amirkalali, G. Hossein Ashrafi, Mahmoodreza Khoonsari et al.
1 citations
Scientific Reports
Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
1.35
article

External validity of cardiovascular risk assessment tools in individuals with MASLD (NAFLD): a cohort study

Fahimeh Safarnezhad Tameshkel, Bahareh Amirkalali, G. Hossein Ashrafi, Mahmoodreza Khoonsari, Maziar Moradi‐Lakeh, Hossein Ajdarkosh, Mahshid Panahi, Nima Motamed, Mohammad Hadi Karbalaie Niya, Mansooreh Maadi, Farhad Zamani, Dhayaneethie Perumal, Maral Ahmadi
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The present study was conducted to evaluate the external validity of various cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk assessment tools in predicting CVD events among individuals with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD). The Amol prospective cohort study spanned a follow-up period of seven years, from 2009 to 2010 to 2016-2017. A total of 1,431 individuals aged 40-75 years were included. The 10-year cardiovascular risk was estimated for each participant using four risk assessment tools: the Pooled Cohort Equations of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA), the Systematic Coronary Risk Evaluation (SCORE) equations, the Framingham General Cardiovascular Risk Profile, and the SCORE2 equations. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves were used to assess the discrimination ability of these tools. The ACC/AHA tool demonstrated the highest predictive ability for both fatal CVD events (AUC: 0.92, 95% CI: 0.88-0.97 for men; AUC: 0.87, 95% CI: 0.79-0.96 for women) and composite CVD events (AUC: 0.68, 95% CI: 0.62-0.75 for men; AUC: 0.79, 95% CI: 0.72-0.85 for women). Based on these findings, cardiovascular risk assessment tools, particularly the ACC/AHA tool, can be applied in clinical settings to evaluate the future risk of CVD events in women with MASLD. However, the SCORE equations also exhibited excellent predictive ability for fatal cardiac events, requiring fewer variables.

Scientific ReportsVol. 15(1)
Zanjan University of Medical Sciences (IR), Iran University of Medical Sciences (IR), Kingston University London (GB), Firoozgar General Hospital (IR), Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences (IR), American University in the Emirates (AE)
Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
1.35
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.