Exploring similarities and differences in how researchers and young people understand key terms in youth mental-health research

A lack of a shared understanding of key terms is acknowledged as a significant barrier to interdisciplinary research. This paper examines the ways in which a broadly interdisciplinary team of academics and youth co-researchers involved in mental health research interpreted a number of research and mental health terms that are central to their work in order to understand conceptual differences in how different stakeholder groups approach these terms. Data was collected in four phases (interviews, written responses, and two participatory 'living labs') and was analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. Results revealed a wide disparity in the way participants understood key terms (including: 'research', 'data', 'loneliness', 'safe space' and 'resilience'). Our study highlights the need for more inclusive approaches to mental health research, where diverse perspectives and lived experiences inform both methodology and practice from the outset. In conclusion we suggest a new framework (the EQUITY framework) as a tool to operationalise these findings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Published
2025-09-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-05809-5
Primary Topic
Health disparities and outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring similarities and differences in how researchers and young people understand key terms in youth mental-health research

Paul Cooke, Anna Mankee‐Williams, Ruth Herbert, Emma Williams et al.
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Health disparities and outcomes
article

Exploring similarities and differences in how researchers and young people understand key terms in youth mental-health research

Paul Cooke, Anna Mankee‐Williams, Ruth Herbert, Emma Williams, Kamaldeep Bhui, Raginie Duara, Siobhan Hugh‐Jones, Nicola Shaughnessy, Georgia Pavlopoulou, Edmund Sonuga‐Barke, Sylvan Baker
article en

Abstract

A lack of a shared understanding of key terms is acknowledged as a significant barrier to interdisciplinary research. This paper examines the ways in which a broadly interdisciplinary team of academics and youth co-researchers involved in mental health research interpreted a number of research and mental health terms that are central to their work in order to understand conceptual differences in how different stakeholder groups approach these terms. Data was collected in four phases (interviews, written responses, and two participatory 'living labs') and was analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. Results revealed a wide disparity in the way participants understood key terms (including: 'research', 'data', 'loneliness', 'safe space' and 'resilience'). Our study highlights the need for more inclusive approaches to mental health research, where diverse perspectives and lived experiences inform both methodology and practice from the outset. In conclusion we suggest a new framework (the EQUITY framework) as a tool to operationalise these findings.

Humanities and Social Sciences CommunicationsVol. 12(1)
University of Leeds (GB), St George's, University of London (GB), King's College London (GB), Falmouth University (GB), University of Kent (GB), Royal Central School of Speech and Drama (GB), University of Surrey (GB), University of Oxford (GB), City St George's, University of London (GB), University College London (GB)
UK Coronavirus Immunology Consortium, Arts and Humanities Research Council, Medical Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Health disparities and outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.