Characterising galaxy cluster scaling relations as cosmic isotropy tracers using FLAMINGO simulations

The standard cosmological model, ΛCDM, assumes isotropy on large cosmic scales. However, recent studies using galaxy cluster scaling relations have reported an apparent H 0 anisotropy at 5.4 σ that could be attributed to large bulk flows extending beyond 500 Mpc, which is in disagreement with ΛCDM. To quantify the statistical tension of the observational galaxy cluster data used in past studies with ΛCDM, we utilised the isotropic (2.8 Gpc) 3 run of the FLAMINGO (ΛCDM) simulations, the largest hydrodynamical cosmological simulation available to date. We created 1728 simulated lightcones and studied the apparent level of anisotropy traced by X-ray and thermal Sunyaev-Zeldovich scaling relations in the same cluster sample selection and methodology as in the past study. We find the probability of such apparent anisotropies randomly emerging in cluster scaling relations within a ΛCDM universe to be 0.12% (3.2 σ ). The discrepancy goes up to ∼3.6 σ when modelled as a bulk flow at z < 0.1. We also find that statistical noise accounts for over 80% of the anisotropy amplitude in each lightcone, with large peculiar velocities contributing less than 20%. We also show that anisotropy amplitudes are highly sensitive to the intrinsic scatter in the scaling relations, with tighter relations providing stronger constraints. Nevertheless, the tension between the past results and ΛCDM persists, albeit at a lower significance than previously reported.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Astronomy and Astrophysics
Published
2025-09-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202554979
Primary Topic
Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Characterising galaxy cluster scaling relations as cosmic isotropy tracers using FLAMINGO simulations

Joey Braspenning, Joop Schaye, Matthieu Schaller, K. Migkas et al.
Astronomy and Astrophysics
Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
article

Characterising galaxy cluster scaling relations as cosmic isotropy tracers using FLAMINGO simulations

Joey Braspenning, Joop Schaye, Matthieu Schaller, K. Migkas, Yandong He
article en

Abstract

The standard cosmological model, ΛCDM, assumes isotropy on large cosmic scales. However, recent studies using galaxy cluster scaling relations have reported an apparent H 0 anisotropy at 5.4 σ that could be attributed to large bulk flows extending beyond 500 Mpc, which is in disagreement with ΛCDM. To quantify the statistical tension of the observational galaxy cluster data used in past studies with ΛCDM, we utilised the isotropic (2.8 Gpc) 3 run of the FLAMINGO (ΛCDM) simulations, the largest hydrodynamical cosmological simulation available to date. We created 1728 simulated lightcones and studied the apparent level of anisotropy traced by X-ray and thermal Sunyaev-Zeldovich scaling relations in the same cluster sample selection and methodology as in the past study. We find the probability of such apparent anisotropies randomly emerging in cluster scaling relations within a ΛCDM universe to be 0.12% (3.2 σ ). The discrepancy goes up to ∼3.6 σ when modelled as a bulk flow at z < 0.1. We also find that statistical noise accounts for over 80% of the anisotropy amplitude in each lightcone, with large peculiar velocities contributing less than 20%. We also show that anisotropy amplitudes are highly sensitive to the intrinsic scatter in the scaling relations, with tighter relations providing stronger constraints. Nevertheless, the tension between the past results and ΛCDM persists, albeit at a lower significance than previously reported.

Astronomy and AstrophysicsVol. 702
Leiden University (NL), Max Planck Institute for Astronomy (DE), Instituto de Física Teórica (ES), Space Research Organisation Netherlands (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.