Disproportionality analysis of infection associated with antidiabetic drug use patterns

While various antidiabetic drug classes are associated with differing infection risks, comprehensive evidence on infection risk across multidrug regimens remains limited. Therefore, this study aims to investigate the pharmacovigilance signal between antidiabetic drug use and infection risk, considering the number and patterns of drug use. This study evaluated the pharmacovigilance signal between antidiabetic drug use and infection utilizing the global pharmacovigilance database. To account for adverse events from multiple drug use, we restructured the database at the individual level using a unique demographic identifier, allowing assessment of infection risk by drug combination and count. Antidiabetic drugs include metformin, sulfonylureas, dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors, glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs), sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors, thiazolidinediones, alpha-glucosidase inhibitors, and insulin, with infections categorized by the system. The pharmacovigilance signal of adverse drug reactions was estimated using adjusted reporting odds ratios (aRORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) through multivariable logistic regression. SGLT2 inhibitor users reported the highest frequency of infections (n = 13,570), followed by insulin (n = 11,322) and GLP-1 RAs (n = 5966). When analyzing only monotherapy, excluding combination use, urinary tract infections were significantly linked solely to SGLT2 inhibitors (aROR, 10.41 [95% CI, 9.76-11.09]), while hepatobiliary and pancreatic infections were associated with DPP-4 inhibitors (aROR, 1.72 [95% CI, 1.28-2.31]), with no significant pharmacovigilance signal observed for other drug classes. Compared to monotherapy, combination therapy with two drugs (aROR, 1.24 [95% CI, 1.20-1.29]) or three or more drugs (aROR, 1.42 [95% CI, 1.13-1.79]) was associated with infection. Although the results from disproportionality analysis did not indicate causal relationship, our findings indicate that infection types vary between monotherapy and combination therapy, highlighting the need for further investigation into these pharmacovigilance signal due to the increased susceptibility of individuals with diabetes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-09-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-18723-2
Primary Topic
Pharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug Reactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Disproportionality analysis of infection associated with antidiabetic drug use patterns

Jaeyu Park, Sang Youl Rhee, Jaehyeong Cho, Hayeon Lee et al.
Scientific Reports
Pharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug Reactions
article

Disproportionality analysis of infection associated with antidiabetic drug use patterns

Jaeyu Park, Sang Youl Rhee, Jaehyeong Cho, Hayeon Lee, Kyeongmin Lee, Dong Keon Yon, André Hajek, Francesco Branda, Tae Hyeon Kim, Jae-Won Kim, Seoyoung Park, Tae-Jin Song, Hyunjee Kim, Hyesu Jo
article en

Abstract

While various antidiabetic drug classes are associated with differing infection risks, comprehensive evidence on infection risk across multidrug regimens remains limited. Therefore, this study aims to investigate the pharmacovigilance signal between antidiabetic drug use and infection risk, considering the number and patterns of drug use. This study evaluated the pharmacovigilance signal between antidiabetic drug use and infection utilizing the global pharmacovigilance database. To account for adverse events from multiple drug use, we restructured the database at the individual level using a unique demographic identifier, allowing assessment of infection risk by drug combination and count. Antidiabetic drugs include metformin, sulfonylureas, dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors, glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs), sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors, thiazolidinediones, alpha-glucosidase inhibitors, and insulin, with infections categorized by the system. The pharmacovigilance signal of adverse drug reactions was estimated using adjusted reporting odds ratios (aRORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) through multivariable logistic regression. SGLT2 inhibitor users reported the highest frequency of infections (n = 13,570), followed by insulin (n = 11,322) and GLP-1 RAs (n = 5966). When analyzing only monotherapy, excluding combination use, urinary tract infections were significantly linked solely to SGLT2 inhibitors (aROR, 10.41 [95% CI, 9.76-11.09]), while hepatobiliary and pancreatic infections were associated with DPP-4 inhibitors (aROR, 1.72 [95% CI, 1.28-2.31]), with no significant pharmacovigilance signal observed for other drug classes. Compared to monotherapy, combination therapy with two drugs (aROR, 1.24 [95% CI, 1.20-1.29]) or three or more drugs (aROR, 1.42 [95% CI, 1.13-1.79]) was associated with infection. Although the results from disproportionality analysis did not indicate causal relationship, our findings indicate that infection types vary between monotherapy and combination therapy, highlighting the need for further investigation into these pharmacovigilance signal due to the increased susceptibility of individuals with diabetes.

Scientific ReportsVol. 15(1)
Ewha Womans University (KR), Università Campus Bio-Medico (IT), Universität Hamburg (DE), Kyung Hee University (KR), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (DE), Kyung Hee University Medical Center (KR), CHA University (KR)
World Health Organization, National Research Foundation, National Research Foundation of Korea, Ministry of Science and ICT, South Korea, Institute for Information and Communications Technology Promotion
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Pharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug Reactions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.