Diagnostic accuracy of a machine learning model using radiomics features from breast synthetic MRI

In breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), the differentiation between benign and malignant breast masses relies on the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System Magnetic Resonance Imaging (BI-RADS-MRI) lexicon. While BI-RADS-MRI classification demonstrates high sensitivity, specificities vary. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of machine learning models utilizing radiomics features derived from synthetic MRI to distinguish benign from malignant breast masses. Patients who underwent breast MRI, including a multi-dynamic multi-echo (MDME) sequence using 3.0 T MRI, and had histopathologically diagnosed enhanced breast mass lesions were retrospectively included. Clinical features, lesion shape features, texture features, and textural evaluation metrics were extracted. Machine learning models were trained and evaluated, and an ensemble model integrating BI-RADS and the machine learning model was also assessed. A total of 199 lesions (48 benign, 151 malignant) in 199 patients were included in the cross-validation dataset, while 43 lesions (15 benign, 28 malignant) in 40 new patients were included in the test dataset. For the test dataset, the sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic for BI-RADS were 100%, 33.3%, 76.7%, and 0.667, respectively. The logistic regression model yielded 64.3% sensitivity, 80.0% specificity, 69.8% accuracy, and an AUC of 0.707. The ensemble model achieved 82.1% sensitivity, 86.7% specificity, 83.7% accuracy, and an AUC of 0.883. The AUC of the ensemble model was significantly larger than that of both BI-RADS and the machine learning model. The ensemble model integrating BI-RADS and machine learning improved lesion classification.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Medical Imaging
Published
2025-09-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12880-025-01930-8
Primary Topic
MRI in cancer diagnosis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Diagnostic accuracy of a machine learning model using radiomics features from breast synthetic MRI

K. Kuwabara, Riko Kitazawa, Yasuhiro Shiraishi, Kanako Okada et al.
BMC Medical Imaging
MRI in cancer diagnosis
article

Diagnostic accuracy of a machine learning model using radiomics features from breast synthetic MRI

K. Kuwabara, Riko Kitazawa, Yasuhiro Shiraishi, Kanako Okada, Mie Kurata, Wataru Toshimori, Naoto Kawaguchi, Hasnine Haque, Megumi Matsuda, Masaki Matsumoto, Teruhito Kido, Takuya Matsuda, Yoshiaki Kamei, Shotaro Fuchibe, Yuki Nobe
article en

Abstract

In breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), the differentiation between benign and malignant breast masses relies on the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System Magnetic Resonance Imaging (BI-RADS-MRI) lexicon. While BI-RADS-MRI classification demonstrates high sensitivity, specificities vary. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of machine learning models utilizing radiomics features derived from synthetic MRI to distinguish benign from malignant breast masses. Patients who underwent breast MRI, including a multi-dynamic multi-echo (MDME) sequence using 3.0 T MRI, and had histopathologically diagnosed enhanced breast mass lesions were retrospectively included. Clinical features, lesion shape features, texture features, and textural evaluation metrics were extracted. Machine learning models were trained and evaluated, and an ensemble model integrating BI-RADS and the machine learning model was also assessed. A total of 199 lesions (48 benign, 151 malignant) in 199 patients were included in the cross-validation dataset, while 43 lesions (15 benign, 28 malignant) in 40 new patients were included in the test dataset. For the test dataset, the sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic for BI-RADS were 100%, 33.3%, 76.7%, and 0.667, respectively. The logistic regression model yielded 64.3% sensitivity, 80.0% specificity, 69.8% accuracy, and an AUC of 0.707. The ensemble model achieved 82.1% sensitivity, 86.7% specificity, 83.7% accuracy, and an AUC of 0.883. The AUC of the ensemble model was significantly larger than that of both BI-RADS and the machine learning model. The ensemble model integrating BI-RADS and machine learning improved lesion classification.

BMC Medical ImagingVol. 25(1)
National Institute of Technology, Niihama College (JP), General Electric (Spain) (ES), Tokyo Health Care University (JP), Ehime Medical Center (JP), Ehime University Hospital (JP), Ehime Prefectural Central Hospital (JP), Ehime University (JP)
Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
MRI in cancer diagnosis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.