Extending quantum-mechanical benchmark accuracy to biological ligand-pocket interactions

Predicting the binding affinity of ligands to protein pockets is key in the drug design pipeline. The flexibility of ligand-pocket motifs arises from a range of attractive and repulsive electronic interactions during binding. Accurately accounting for all interactions requires robust quantum-mechanical (QM) benchmarks, which are scarce for ligand-pocket systems. Additionally, disagreement between "gold standard" Coupled Cluster (CC) and Quantum Monte Carlo (QMC) methods casts doubt on many benchmarks for larger non-covalent systems. We introduce the "QUantum Interacting Dimer" (QUID) benchmark framework containing 170 non-covalent (non-)equilibrium systems modeling chemically and structurally diverse ligand-pocket motifs. Symmetry-adapted perturbation theory shows that QUID broadly covers non-covalent binding motifs and energetic contributions. Robust binding energies are obtained using complementary CC and QMC methods, achieving agreement of 0.5 kcal/mol. The benchmark data analysis reveals that several dispersion-inclusive density functional approximations provide accurate energy predictions, though their atomic van der Waals forces differ in magnitude and orientation. Contrarily, semiempirical methods and empirical force fields require improvements in capturing non-covalent interactions (NCIs) for out-of-equilibrium geometries. The wide span of NCIs, highly accurate interaction energies, and analysis of molecular properties take QUID beyond the "gold standard" for QM benchmarks of ligand-protein systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nature Communications
Published
2025-09-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-63587-9
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Advanced Chemical Physics Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.23

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Extending quantum-mechanical benchmark accuracy to biological ligand-pocket interactions

David Rogers, Alexandre Tkatchenko, Jorge A. Charry, Péter R. Nagy et al.
5 citations
Nature Communications
Advanced Chemical Physics Studies
6.23
article

Extending quantum-mechanical benchmark accuracy to biological ligand-pocket interactions

David Rogers, Alexandre Tkatchenko, Jorge A. Charry, Péter R. Nagy, Balázs D. Lőrincz, Leonardo Medrano Sandonas, Mirela Puleva
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Predicting the binding affinity of ligands to protein pockets is key in the drug design pipeline. The flexibility of ligand-pocket motifs arises from a range of attractive and repulsive electronic interactions during binding. Accurately accounting for all interactions requires robust quantum-mechanical (QM) benchmarks, which are scarce for ligand-pocket systems. Additionally, disagreement between "gold standard" Coupled Cluster (CC) and Quantum Monte Carlo (QMC) methods casts doubt on many benchmarks for larger non-covalent systems. We introduce the "QUantum Interacting Dimer" (QUID) benchmark framework containing 170 non-covalent (non-)equilibrium systems modeling chemically and structurally diverse ligand-pocket motifs. Symmetry-adapted perturbation theory shows that QUID broadly covers non-covalent binding motifs and energetic contributions. Robust binding energies are obtained using complementary CC and QMC methods, achieving agreement of 0.5 kcal/mol. The benchmark data analysis reveals that several dispersion-inclusive density functional approximations provide accurate energy predictions, though their atomic van der Waals forces differ in magnitude and orientation. Contrarily, semiempirical methods and empirical force fields require improvements in capturing non-covalent interactions (NCIs) for out-of-equilibrium geometries. The wide span of NCIs, highly accurate interaction energies, and analysis of molecular properties take QUID beyond the "gold standard" for QM benchmarks of ligand-protein systems.

Nature CommunicationsVol. 16(1)
Oak Ridge National Laboratory (US), University of Luxembourg (LU), Budapest University of Technology and Economics (HU), Pázmány Péter Catholic University (HU), Max Bergmann Zentrum für Biomaterialien (DE), Luxembourg Institute of Science and Technology (LU), Montavid Thermodynamic Research Group (HU), Luxembourg Institute of Socio-Economic Research (LU), Arbed (Luxembourg) (LU)
U.S. Department of Energy, Université du Luxembourg, Magyar Tudományos Akadémia, Nemzeti Kutatási Fejlesztési és Innovációs Hivatal, Office of Science, Argonne National Laboratory
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Advanced Chemical Physics Studies
6.23
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.