Comparison of chiral limit studies in a curvature mass versus on-shell renormalized quark-meson model using ChPT

Consistent chiral limit has been investigated in the curvature mass parametrized quark-meson (QM) model with the quark one-loop vacuum term (QMVT) employing the infrared regularized chiral perturbation theory predicted scaling of the pion, kaon decay constants <a:math xmlns:a="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><a:mrow><a:msub><a:mrow><a:mi>f</a:mi></a:mrow><a:mrow><a:mi>π</a:mi></a:mrow></a:msub></a:mrow></a:math>, <c:math xmlns:c="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><c:mrow><c:msub><c:mrow><c:mi>f</c:mi></c:mrow><c:mrow><c:mi>K</c:mi></c:mrow></c:msub></c:mrow></c:math> and <e:math xmlns:e="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><e:mrow><e:msubsup><e:mrow><e:mi>M</e:mi></e:mrow><e:mrow><e:mi>η</e:mi></e:mrow><e:mrow><e:mn>2</e:mn></e:mrow></e:msubsup><e:mo>=</e:mo><e:msubsup><e:mrow><e:mi>m</e:mi></e:mrow><e:mrow><e:mi>η</e:mi></e:mrow><e:mrow><e:mn>2</e:mn></e:mrow></e:msubsup><e:mo>+</e:mo><e:msubsup><e:mrow><e:mi>m</e:mi></e:mrow><e:mrow><e:msup><e:mrow><e:mi>η</e:mi></e:mrow><e:mrow><e:mo>′</e:mo></e:mrow></e:msup></e:mrow><e:mrow><e:mn>2</e:mn></e:mrow></e:msubsup></e:mrow></e:math> when the <g:math xmlns:g="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><g:mi>π</g:mi></g:math> and <i:math xmlns:i="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><i:mi>K</i:mi></i:math> meson masses are reduced as one moves away from the physical point in the Columbia plot. Comparing the QMVT model Columbia plots with the corresponding Columbia plots computed in the very recent work of Tiwari [], using the on-shell renormalized QM (RQM) model and the earlier work of Resch [] using functional renormalization group techniques in the extended mean field approximation of the QM (e-MFA:QM-FRG) model, it has been estimated how the first, second, and crossover chiral transition regions in the <k:math xmlns:k="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><k:msub><k:mi>m</k:mi><k:mi>π</k:mi></k:msub><k:mo>−</k:mo><k:msub><k:mi>m</k:mi><k:mi>K</k:mi></k:msub></k:math>(<m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><m:msub><m:mi>m</m:mi><m:mrow><m:mi>u</m:mi><m:mi>d</m:mi></m:mrow></m:msub><m:mo>−</m:mo><m:msub><m:mi>m</m:mi><m:mi>s</m:mi></m:msub></m:math>) and the <o:math xmlns:o="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><o:mi>μ</o:mi><o:mo>−</o:mo><o:msub><o:mi>m</o:mi><o:mi>K</o:mi></o:msub></o:math>(<q:math xmlns:q="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><q:mi>μ</q:mi><q:mo>−</q:mo><q:msub><q:mi>m</q:mi><q:mi>s</q:mi></q:msub></q:math>) planes get modified by different methods of implementing the quark one-loop vacuum fluctuations in the QM model. Since both the e-MFA:QM-FRG and the QMVT model use curvature meson masses to fix the parameters and the dimensional regularization of vacuum divergences are incorporated equivalently, the differences in their results can be attributed to different methods of approaching the chiral limit. The first order regions in the QMVT model while being much smaller than those in the RQM model have similar features but moderately smaller area than those in the e-MFA:QM-FRG study. In going to the chiral limit, the vacuum mass <s:math xmlns:s="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><s:msub><s:mi>m</s:mi><s:mi>σ</s:mi></s:msub><s:mo>=</s:mo><s:mn>530</s:mn><s:mtext> </s:mtext><s:mtext> </s:mtext><s:mi>MeV</s:mi></s:math> that is taken at the physical point does not change in the QMVT model whereas it decreases significantly in the e-MFA:QM-FRG study. Being different from the pole mass <u:math xmlns:u="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><u:msub><u:mi>m</u:mi><u:mi>σ</u:mi></u:msub><u:mo>=</u:mo><u:mn>530</u:mn><u:mtext> </u:mtext><u:mtext> </u:mtext><u:mi>MeV</u:mi></u:math>, the RQM model vacuum curvature mass <w:math xmlns:w="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><w:msub><w:mi>m</w:mi><w:mrow><w:mi>σ</w:mi><w:mo>,</w:mo><w:mi>c</w:mi></w:mrow></w:msub></w:math> increases toward the chiral limit from its minimum value at the physical point.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physical review. D/Physical review. D.
Published
2025-09-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1103/9zzh-d65x
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.87
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of chiral limit studies in a curvature mass versus on-shell renormalized quark-meson model using ChPT

V. Tiwari
1 citations
Physical review. D/Physical review. D.
Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions
1.87
article

Comparison of chiral limit studies in a curvature mass versus on-shell renormalized quark-meson model using ChPT

V. Tiwari
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Consistent chiral limit has been investigated in the curvature mass parametrized quark-meson (QM) model with the quark one-loop vacuum term (QMVT) employing the infrared regularized chiral perturbation theory predicted scaling of the pion, kaon decay constants <a:math xmlns:a="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><a:mrow><a:msub><a:mrow><a:mi>f</a:mi></a:mrow><a:mrow><a:mi>π</a:mi></a:mrow></a:msub></a:mrow></a:math>, <c:math xmlns:c="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><c:mrow><c:msub><c:mrow><c:mi>f</c:mi></c:mrow><c:mrow><c:mi>K</c:mi></c:mrow></c:msub></c:mrow></c:math> and <e:math xmlns:e="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><e:mrow><e:msubsup><e:mrow><e:mi>M</e:mi></e:mrow><e:mrow><e:mi>η</e:mi></e:mrow><e:mrow><e:mn>2</e:mn></e:mrow></e:msubsup><e:mo>=</e:mo><e:msubsup><e:mrow><e:mi>m</e:mi></e:mrow><e:mrow><e:mi>η</e:mi></e:mrow><e:mrow><e:mn>2</e:mn></e:mrow></e:msubsup><e:mo>+</e:mo><e:msubsup><e:mrow><e:mi>m</e:mi></e:mrow><e:mrow><e:msup><e:mrow><e:mi>η</e:mi></e:mrow><e:mrow><e:mo>′</e:mo></e:mrow></e:msup></e:mrow><e:mrow><e:mn>2</e:mn></e:mrow></e:msubsup></e:mrow></e:math> when the <g:math xmlns:g="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><g:mi>π</g:mi></g:math> and <i:math xmlns:i="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><i:mi>K</i:mi></i:math> meson masses are reduced as one moves away from the physical point in the Columbia plot. Comparing the QMVT model Columbia plots with the corresponding Columbia plots computed in the very recent work of Tiwari [], using the on-shell renormalized QM (RQM) model and the earlier work of Resch [] using functional renormalization group techniques in the extended mean field approximation of the QM (e-MFA:QM-FRG) model, it has been estimated how the first, second, and crossover chiral transition regions in the <k:math xmlns:k="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><k:msub><k:mi>m</k:mi><k:mi>π</k:mi></k:msub><k:mo>−</k:mo><k:msub><k:mi>m</k:mi><k:mi>K</k:mi></k:msub></k:math>(<m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><m:msub><m:mi>m</m:mi><m:mrow><m:mi>u</m:mi><m:mi>d</m:mi></m:mrow></m:msub><m:mo>−</m:mo><m:msub><m:mi>m</m:mi><m:mi>s</m:mi></m:msub></m:math>) and the <o:math xmlns:o="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><o:mi>μ</o:mi><o:mo>−</o:mo><o:msub><o:mi>m</o:mi><o:mi>K</o:mi></o:msub></o:math>(<q:math xmlns:q="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><q:mi>μ</q:mi><q:mo>−</q:mo><q:msub><q:mi>m</q:mi><q:mi>s</q:mi></q:msub></q:math>) planes get modified by different methods of implementing the quark one-loop vacuum fluctuations in the QM model. Since both the e-MFA:QM-FRG and the QMVT model use curvature meson masses to fix the parameters and the dimensional regularization of vacuum divergences are incorporated equivalently, the differences in their results can be attributed to different methods of approaching the chiral limit. The first order regions in the QMVT model while being much smaller than those in the RQM model have similar features but moderately smaller area than those in the e-MFA:QM-FRG study. In going to the chiral limit, the vacuum mass <s:math xmlns:s="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><s:msub><s:mi>m</s:mi><s:mi>σ</s:mi></s:msub><s:mo>=</s:mo><s:mn>530</s:mn><s:mtext> </s:mtext><s:mtext> </s:mtext><s:mi>MeV</s:mi></s:math> that is taken at the physical point does not change in the QMVT model whereas it decreases significantly in the e-MFA:QM-FRG study. Being different from the pole mass <u:math xmlns:u="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><u:msub><u:mi>m</u:mi><u:mi>σ</u:mi></u:msub><u:mo>=</u:mo><u:mn>530</u:mn><u:mtext> </u:mtext><u:mtext> </u:mtext><u:mi>MeV</u:mi></u:math>, the RQM model vacuum curvature mass <w:math xmlns:w="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><w:msub><w:mi>m</w:mi><w:mrow><w:mi>σ</w:mi><w:mo>,</w:mo><w:mi>c</w:mi></w:mrow></w:msub></w:math> increases toward the chiral limit from its minimum value at the physical point.

Physical review. D/Physical review. D.Vol. 112(5)
University of Allahabad (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions
1.87
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.