A Performance Measurement Study Using the CRITIC and ARAS Methods in the International Aerospace Industry

This study aims to evaluate the performance of manufacturing companies operating in the international aerospace industry. In this context, the financial performance of 12 leading companies from 2019-2023 is analysed through multi-criteria decision-making processes using the CRITIC and ARAS methods. In order to evaluate the performance of the companies in question, a number of financial indicators are taken into consideration, including total capital, capital expenditures, gross income, operating expenses, total liabilities and working capital. The CRITIC method was employed to ascertain the relative importance of the criteria, while the ARAS method was utilised to evaluate the performance of the companies in question. The results demonstrate that the Transdigm Group is the most successful company, with General Electric consistently ranking second. Conversely, the performance of companies such as Airbus and Boeing has exhibited variability over time. The findings of this study offer valuable insights for strategic performance evaluation in the aerospace industry.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Aviation Science and Technology
Published
2025-09-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.23890/ijast.vm06is02.0205
Primary Topic
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Performance Measurement Study Using the CRITIC and ARAS Methods in the International Aerospace Industry

Mehmet Yaşar
International Journal of Aviation Science and Technology
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
article

A Performance Measurement Study Using the CRITIC and ARAS Methods in the International Aerospace Industry

Mehmet Yaşar
article en

Abstract

This study aims to evaluate the performance of manufacturing companies operating in the international aerospace industry. In this context, the financial performance of 12 leading companies from 2019-2023 is analysed through multi-criteria decision-making processes using the CRITIC and ARAS methods. In order to evaluate the performance of the companies in question, a number of financial indicators are taken into consideration, including total capital, capital expenditures, gross income, operating expenses, total liabilities and working capital. The CRITIC method was employed to ascertain the relative importance of the criteria, while the ARAS method was utilised to evaluate the performance of the companies in question. The results demonstrate that the Transdigm Group is the most successful company, with General Electric consistently ranking second. Conversely, the performance of companies such as Airbus and Boeing has exhibited variability over time. The findings of this study offer valuable insights for strategic performance evaluation in the aerospace industry.

International Journal of Aviation Science and TechnologyVol. vm06(is02)
Kastamonu University (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.