Teori dan Metode Otentisitas Hadis

This paper explores the authenticity of hadith, a key area of study in ‘ulūm al-ḥadīth, with a focus on the development of the sanad (chain of transmission). Sanad emerged after the death of Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him), and while methods varied during the era of the Companions, it reached its peak by the end of the first century. The study of hadith transmission has drawn interest from both Muslim scholars and non-Muslim researchers, such as Schacht, whose “Projecting Back” theory is considered difficult to implement. Three main perspectives on hadith authenticity have emerged: a skeptical view by Mahmud Abu Rayyah, a non-skeptical view by Yusuf al-Qaradawi, and a middle-ground approach by Muhammad al-Ghazālī. This qualitative study, using library research, examines classical and modern authentication methods, concluding that both are necessary for assessing hadith authenticity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Tamaddun
Published
2025-09-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.70115/tamaddun.v1i3.310
Primary Topic
Decision Support System Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Teori dan Metode Otentisitas Hadis

Muhammad Zaki, Nurul Hidayati, BQ. Citra Handayani
Tamaddun
Decision Support System Applications
article

Teori dan Metode Otentisitas Hadis

Muhammad Zaki, Nurul Hidayati, BQ. Citra Handayani
article en

Abstract

This paper explores the authenticity of hadith, a key area of study in ‘ulūm al-ḥadīth, with a focus on the development of the sanad (chain of transmission). Sanad emerged after the death of Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him), and while methods varied during the era of the Companions, it reached its peak by the end of the first century. The study of hadith transmission has drawn interest from both Muslim scholars and non-Muslim researchers, such as Schacht, whose “Projecting Back” theory is considered difficult to implement. Three main perspectives on hadith authenticity have emerged: a skeptical view by Mahmud Abu Rayyah, a non-skeptical view by Yusuf al-Qaradawi, and a middle-ground approach by Muhammad al-Ghazālī. This qualitative study, using library research, examines classical and modern authentication methods, concluding that both are necessary for assessing hadith authenticity.

TamaddunVol. 1(3)
Institut Agama Islam Negeri Bengkulu (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
Decision Support System Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.