New approach methodologies for evaluating developmental and reproductive toxicity potential: Review on state of the art, applicability for cosmetic related ingredients and coverage of developmental stages

• Reviewed silico tools and 17 in vitro DART NAMs to identify potential gaps • NAMs represented specific receptors, enzymes and pathways • At least one in vitro NAM available for key stages of DART • This analysis will help with NAM development and their combined use in NGRAs The development of in vitro developmental and reproductive toxicity (DART) models is challenging. We made a brief review of in silico models and an in-depth review of 17 established in vitro New Approach Methodologies (NAMs) used to assess the DART potential of cosmetic-related ingredients. We investigated their coverage of the stages of male and female fertility and embryo-fetal development and related biomarkers to identify potential gaps. There are multiple in silico tools for early screening to flag DART potential, design subsequent testing, use in a weight of evidence approach or to fill data gaps. All stages of male and female fertility and embryo-fetal development are covered by at least one of the 17 NAMs evaluated, with most focusing on late organogenesis. Many NAMs measure specific receptors, enzymes and pathways involved in teratogenicity, highlighting the increased understanding of the pathways involved. Cellular endpoint assays are being refined by incorporating biomarker measurements. These can be combined in integrated and WoE approaches across different tiers in a testing strategy to cover different pathways to provide good confidence in the outcome of the testing. The most cited NAM in the literature was the zebrafish embryotoxicity test. This is not generally used for cosmetic-related ingredients, which are mainly evaluated using molecular and cellular assays related to steroidogenesis. The predictivity of several NAMs is increased when the measured or predicted plasma concentration is considered. In conclusion, this analysis indicates that currently available NAMs enable an analysis of the different stages of male and female fertility and embryo-fetal development.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
NAM journal.
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.namjnl.2025.100055
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.20
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

New approach methodologies for evaluating developmental and reproductive toxicity potential: Review on state of the art, applicability for cosmetic related ingredients and coverage of developmental stages

M. Burbank, Léopold Carron, A. Noel-Voisin, Michael S. Leonard et al.
1 citations
NAM journal.
Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals
1.20
article

New approach methodologies for evaluating developmental and reproductive toxicity potential: Review on state of the art, applicability for cosmetic related ingredients and coverage of developmental stages

M. Burbank, Léopold Carron, A. Noel-Voisin, Michael S. Leonard, T. Bringel, L. Guillet-Revol, Ann Detroyer, Romain Grall, Gladys Ouédraogo, Simon Emery, N. De Croze, N. Golbamaki, N. Hewitt, A. Riu, F. Gautier
article en
1 citations

Abstract

• Reviewed silico tools and 17 in vitro DART NAMs to identify potential gaps • NAMs represented specific receptors, enzymes and pathways • At least one in vitro NAM available for key stages of DART • This analysis will help with NAM development and their combined use in NGRAs The development of in vitro developmental and reproductive toxicity (DART) models is challenging. We made a brief review of in silico models and an in-depth review of 17 established in vitro New Approach Methodologies (NAMs) used to assess the DART potential of cosmetic-related ingredients. We investigated their coverage of the stages of male and female fertility and embryo-fetal development and related biomarkers to identify potential gaps. There are multiple in silico tools for early screening to flag DART potential, design subsequent testing, use in a weight of evidence approach or to fill data gaps. All stages of male and female fertility and embryo-fetal development are covered by at least one of the 17 NAMs evaluated, with most focusing on late organogenesis. Many NAMs measure specific receptors, enzymes and pathways involved in teratogenicity, highlighting the increased understanding of the pathways involved. Cellular endpoint assays are being refined by incorporating biomarker measurements. These can be combined in integrated and WoE approaches across different tiers in a testing strategy to cover different pathways to provide good confidence in the outcome of the testing. The most cited NAM in the literature was the zebrafish embryotoxicity test. This is not generally used for cosmetic-related ingredients, which are mainly evaluated using molecular and cellular assays related to steroidogenesis. The predictivity of several NAMs is increased when the measured or predicted plasma concentration is considered. In conclusion, this analysis indicates that currently available NAMs enable an analysis of the different stages of male and female fertility and embryo-fetal development.

NAM journal.Vol. 1
L'Oréal (France) (FR), Université Sorbonne Paris Nord (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals
1.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.