A Registered Report Megastudy on the Persuasiveness of the Most-Cited Climate Messages

It is important to understand how persuasive the most-cited climate change messaging strategies are. In five replication studies, we found limited evidence of persuasive effects of three highly cited strategies (N=3,216). We then conducted a registered report megastudy (N=13,544) testing the effects of the 10 most-cited climate change messaging strategies on Americans’ pro-environmental attitudes and behavior. Six messages significantly affected multiple preregistered attitudes, with effects ranging from one to four percentage points. Persuasiveness varied little across party lines, inconsistent with theories predicting heterogeneous effects for targeted messages. No message increased pro-environmental donations, suggesting costly behaviors are difficult to influence with messaging alone. Inference of mechanisms driving effects was limited as the most impactful messages influenced multiple mediating variables. Taken together, these results identify several persuasive strategies, while also highlighting the limits of short-form messages for increasing Americans’ support for action to address climate change.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-09-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/xwceg_v1
Primary Topic
Climate Change Communication and Perception
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Registered Report Megastudy on the Persuasiveness of the Most-Cited Climate Messages

Ashwini Ashokkumar, Jan G. Voelkel, Jane K. Willenbring, Robb Willer et al.
Climate Change Communication and Perception
article

A Registered Report Megastudy on the Persuasiveness of the Most-Cited Climate Messages

Ashwini Ashokkumar, Jan G. Voelkel, Jane K. Willenbring, Robb Willer, Stephan Lewandowsky, Matthew J. Hornsey, Matthew Feinberg, Erik C. Nisbet, Neil Malhotra, Troy Campbell, Renata Bongiorno, Ullrich K. H. Ecker, P. Sol Hart, Edward Maibach, Anthony Leiserowitz, kelly fuller, Jarret T. Crawford, Chrystal Redekopp, Adina T. Abeles, Sander van der Linden, Alexa Spence, Christopher Wolsko, John T. Jost, Nicholas Frank Pidgeon, Aaron C. Kay
article en

Abstract

It is important to understand how persuasive the most-cited climate change messaging strategies are. In five replication studies, we found limited evidence of persuasive effects of three highly cited strategies (N=3,216). We then conducted a registered report megastudy (N=13,544) testing the effects of the 10 most-cited climate change messaging strategies on Americans’ pro-environmental attitudes and behavior. Six messages significantly affected multiple preregistered attitudes, with effects ranging from one to four percentage points. Persuasiveness varied little across party lines, inconsistent with theories predicting heterogeneous effects for targeted messages. No message increased pro-environmental donations, suggesting costly behaviors are difficult to influence with messaging alone. Inference of mechanisms driving effects was limited as the most impactful messages influenced multiple mediating variables. Taken together, these results identify several persuasive strategies, while also highlighting the limits of short-form messages for increasing Americans’ support for action to address climate change.

New York University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Climate Change Communication and Perception
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.