Use of artificial intelligence algorithms and mixed effects models to analyze educators’ and students’ perceptions and attitudes towards objective structured clinical examinations

Background: During the COVID-19 pandemic, Tunisia implemented Objective Structured Clinical Examinations (OSCEs) for healthcare students at the School of Health Sciences and Technologies in Sousse. This study analyzed satisfaction levels using advanced analytical techniques. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted involving 128 final-year students across all healthcare programs and 31 educators. Two anonymous satisfaction surveys using five-point Likert scales were administered. The analysis employed supervised machine learning (SML), unsupervised machine learning (UML), and linear mixed-effects models (LMEM). The SML utilized Random Forest classification, whilst UML implemented K-means clustering and principal component analysis. Results: The SML demonstrated robust predictive accuracy for satisfaction categories (students: 78%; educators: 100%, though the latter may reflect overfitting due to the small sample size) with strong reliability (kappa values 0.65 and one). UML identified three distinct satisfaction clusters among students and seven among educators, with the highest satisfaction cluster showing a mean score of 3.82±0.34. LMEM revealed that student satisfaction increased with age (β=0.041), whilst educatorsatisfaction correlated negatively with age (β=-0.017) but positively with teaching experience (β=0.016). Those from the Emergency Medical Care program consistently demonstrated higher student satisfaction levels. Conclusions: Integrating advanced analytical methods provided a more profound understanding of OSCE satisfaction patterns than traditional statistical approaches. The findings suggest multiple demographic factors influence OSCE satisfaction, necessitating context-specific approaches to the educational specialty rather than universal solutions. These results have important implications for healthcare education practice, suggesting the need for differentiated approaches to OSCE implementation based on student specialty and educators’ experience levels.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Education for Health
Published
2025-09-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.62694/efh.2025.330
Primary Topic
COVID-19 diagnosis using AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Use of artificial intelligence algorithms and mixed effects models to analyze educators’ and students’ perceptions and attitudes towards objective structured clinical examinations

A. Aounallah, Asma Ben Amor, H. Farhat, Olfa Bouallègue et al.
Education for Health
COVID-19 diagnosis using AI
article

Use of artificial intelligence algorithms and mixed effects models to analyze educators’ and students’ perceptions and attitudes towards objective structured clinical examinations

A. Aounallah, Asma Ben Amor, H. Farhat, Olfa Bouallègue, Guillaume Alinier
article en

Abstract

Background: During the COVID-19 pandemic, Tunisia implemented Objective Structured Clinical Examinations (OSCEs) for healthcare students at the School of Health Sciences and Technologies in Sousse. This study analyzed satisfaction levels using advanced analytical techniques. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted involving 128 final-year students across all healthcare programs and 31 educators. Two anonymous satisfaction surveys using five-point Likert scales were administered. The analysis employed supervised machine learning (SML), unsupervised machine learning (UML), and linear mixed-effects models (LMEM). The SML utilized Random Forest classification, whilst UML implemented K-means clustering and principal component analysis. Results: The SML demonstrated robust predictive accuracy for satisfaction categories (students: 78%; educators: 100%, though the latter may reflect overfitting due to the small sample size) with strong reliability (kappa values 0.65 and one). UML identified three distinct satisfaction clusters among students and seven among educators, with the highest satisfaction cluster showing a mean score of 3.82±0.34. LMEM revealed that student satisfaction increased with age (β=0.041), whilst educatorsatisfaction correlated negatively with age (β=-0.017) but positively with teaching experience (β=0.016). Those from the Emergency Medical Care program consistently demonstrated higher student satisfaction levels. Conclusions: Integrating advanced analytical methods provided a more profound understanding of OSCE satisfaction patterns than traditional statistical approaches. The findings suggest multiple demographic factors influence OSCE satisfaction, necessitating context-specific approaches to the educational specialty rather than universal solutions. These results have important implications for healthcare education practice, suggesting the need for differentiated approaches to OSCE implementation based on student specialty and educators’ experience levels.

Education for HealthVol. 38(3)
Northumbria University (GB), Hôpital Farhat Hached (TN), Hôpital Sahloul (TN), Weill Cornell Medical College in Qatar (QA), Hamad Medical Corporation (QA), University of Sousse (TN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
COVID-19 diagnosis using AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.