Do it yourself: discerning the effects of self-directed activity on conceptual learning

Can you learn better by doing something yourself (DIY) or by watching somebody else do it? We present a new approach to examine this perennial question in research on learning and instruction. In a science learning task, children aged 5 to 7 years (N = 95) either generated predictions themselves (active condition) or observed the predictions of a fictitious other child (yoked condition) before seeing the outcome. Unlike previous yoked designs, we first emulated responses from a Bayesian learner. Critically, these responses were then individually matched to each yoked child given their unique prior beliefs at the start of the experiment. This novel approach allowed us to discern the effects of DIY on conceptual learning much more clearly than before. We found that actively generating predictions led to deeper conceptual understanding than observing another's matched predictions, and that this advantage of DIY was associated with an increased experience of agency.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
npj Science of Learning
Published
2025-09-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-025-00364-9
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Child and Animal Learning Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.44

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Do it yourself: discerning the effects of self-directed activity on conceptual learning

Elizabeth Baraff Bonawitz, Maria Theobald, Garvin Brod, Joseph Colantonio et al.
1 citations
npj Science of Learning
Child and Animal Learning Development
3.44
article

Do it yourself: discerning the effects of self-directed activity on conceptual learning

Elizabeth Baraff Bonawitz, Maria Theobald, Garvin Brod, Joseph Colantonio, Elfriede R. Holstein, Leonie S. Weindorf
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Can you learn better by doing something yourself (DIY) or by watching somebody else do it? We present a new approach to examine this perennial question in research on learning and instruction. In a science learning task, children aged 5 to 7 years (N = 95) either generated predictions themselves (active condition) or observed the predictions of a fictitious other child (yoked condition) before seeing the outcome. Unlike previous yoked designs, we first emulated responses from a Bayesian learner. Critically, these responses were then individually matched to each yoked child given their unique prior beliefs at the start of the experiment. This novel approach allowed us to discern the effects of DIY on conceptual learning much more clearly than before. We found that actively generating predictions led to deeper conceptual understanding than observing another's matched predictions, and that this advantage of DIY was associated with an increased experience of agency.

npj Science of LearningVol. 10(1)
Goethe University Frankfurt (DE), Harvard University Press (US), Individual Development and Adaptive Education (DE), Universität Trier (DE)
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Child and Animal Learning Development
3.44
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Do it yourself: discerning the effects of self-directed activity on conceptual learning — Elizabeth Baraff Bonawitz, Maria Theobald, et al. · npj Science of Learning (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS