Advancing the characterization of urban acoustic environments through multimetric analysis

Urbanization has intensified the complexity of acoustic environments, necessitating a more comprehensive understanding to support urban acoustic planning for healthier living spaces. Traditional noise monitoring, primarily based on sound pressure level indices, is insufficient for capturing the full scope of these environments. This study investigates whether a diverse set of acoustic metrics can improve the characterization of acoustic environments and examines their stability across different land use types. We analyzed 1 year of time-series data from acoustic monitoring stations in Bochum, Germany, calculating psychoacoustic, ecoacoustic, and complex network indices. Our goals were to: (1) identify interdependencies among selected metrics, (2) uncover temporal patterns in acoustic measurements, and (3) relate them to their respective locations. Methods included correlation analysis, DBSCAN (Density-Based Spatial Clustering of Applications with Noise) clustering, principal component analysis, and descriptive statistics with diurnal aggregation. The findings demonstrate that acoustic indices of eight distinct dimensions, along with eight individual metrics, reveal crucial temporal, spatial variations of the acoustic environment and the interplay of individual sound sources overlooked by conventional sound pressure level (SPL) metrics. In particular, the study identifies the maximum Sharpness (Aures method), Link Density, the Bioacoustic Index, and the Amplitude Index as the most effective predictors of land use types, achieving the highest Adjusted Rand Index values (0.25, 0.17, 0.13, 0.13). Incorporating such indices into acoustic monitoring practices offers a refined, site-sensitive framework to identify more nuanced qualities of the acoustic environment, therefore, potentially laying the groundwork for targeted urban interventions that could promote health.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Acta Acustica
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1051/aacus/2025051
Primary Topic
Noise Effects and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Advancing the characterization of urban acoustic environments through multimetric analysis

Bryce T. Lawrence, Moritz Schuck, André Fiebig, Timo Haselhoff et al.
Acta Acustica
Noise Effects and Management
article

Advancing the characterization of urban acoustic environments through multimetric analysis

Bryce T. Lawrence, Moritz Schuck, André Fiebig, Timo Haselhoff, Susanne Moebus
article en

Abstract

Urbanization has intensified the complexity of acoustic environments, necessitating a more comprehensive understanding to support urban acoustic planning for healthier living spaces. Traditional noise monitoring, primarily based on sound pressure level indices, is insufficient for capturing the full scope of these environments. This study investigates whether a diverse set of acoustic metrics can improve the characterization of acoustic environments and examines their stability across different land use types. We analyzed 1 year of time-series data from acoustic monitoring stations in Bochum, Germany, calculating psychoacoustic, ecoacoustic, and complex network indices. Our goals were to: (1) identify interdependencies among selected metrics, (2) uncover temporal patterns in acoustic measurements, and (3) relate them to their respective locations. Methods included correlation analysis, DBSCAN (Density-Based Spatial Clustering of Applications with Noise) clustering, principal component analysis, and descriptive statistics with diurnal aggregation. The findings demonstrate that acoustic indices of eight distinct dimensions, along with eight individual metrics, reveal crucial temporal, spatial variations of the acoustic environment and the interplay of individual sound sources overlooked by conventional sound pressure level (SPL) metrics. In particular, the study identifies the maximum Sharpness (Aures method), Link Density, the Bioacoustic Index, and the Amplitude Index as the most effective predictors of land use types, achieving the highest Adjusted Rand Index values (0.25, 0.17, 0.13, 0.13). Incorporating such indices into acoustic monitoring practices offers a refined, site-sensitive framework to identify more nuanced qualities of the acoustic environment, therefore, potentially laying the groundwork for targeted urban interventions that could promote health.

Acta AcusticaVol. 9
TU Dortmund University (DE), Engineering Acoustics (United States) (US), Landscape Research Group (GB), Technische Universität Berlin (DE), University of Duisburg-Essen (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Noise Effects and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.