Unveiling gender dynamics in introductory physics labs

Abstract The persistent underrepresentation of women and gender minorities within the physical sciences remains a significant issue. This study investigates gender dynamics in introductory algebra-based physics laboratories, focusing on participation, task preferences, and comfort levels. Statistical analysis revealed no significant gender difference in overall participation rates during lab activities. However, significant gender-based disparities emerged in both task preference [ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mrow> <mml:msup> <mml:mi>χ</mml:mi> <mml:mn>2</mml:mn> </mml:msup> <mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo> <mml:mrow> <mml:mtext mathvariant="italic">df</mml:mtext> </mml:mrow> <mml:mo>=</mml:mo> <mml:mn>3</mml:mn> <mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo> <mml:mo>=</mml:mo> <mml:mn>9.548</mml:mn> <mml:mo>,</mml:mo> <mml:mtext> </mml:mtext> <mml:mi>p</mml:mi> <mml:mo>=</mml:mo> <mml:mn>0.023</mml:mn> <mml:mo>,</mml:mo> <mml:mtext> </mml:mtext> <mml:mi>α</mml:mi> <mml:mo>=</mml:mo> <mml:mn>0.05</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> ] and comfort levels [ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mrow> <mml:msup> <mml:mi>χ</mml:mi> <mml:mn>2</mml:mn> </mml:msup> <mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo> <mml:mrow> <mml:mtext mathvariant="italic">df</mml:mtext> </mml:mrow> <mml:mo>=</mml:mo> <mml:mn>3</mml:mn> <mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo> <mml:mo>=</mml:mo> <mml:mn>7.906</mml:mn> <mml:mo>,</mml:mo> <mml:mtext> </mml:mtext> <mml:mi>p</mml:mi> <mml:mo>=</mml:mo> <mml:mn>0.048</mml:mn> <mml:mo>,</mml:mo> <mml:mtext> </mml:mtext> <mml:mi>α</mml:mi> <mml:mo>=</mml:mo> <mml:mn>0.05</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> ]. Male students significantly preferred and felt more comfortable with hands-on equipment handling and data collection, whereas female students more frequently preferred and reported higher comfort with analytical and documentation tasks like note-taking, calculations, and report writing. Qualitative responses highlighted additional challenges reported by some women, including exclusion from group discussions and reluctance to contribute ideas in male-dominated groups. These findings suggest that while overall participation may appear gender-neutral, gendered patterns in task allocation and comfort persist. The results underscore the need for instructional strategies that promote equitable engagement and foster inclusive laboratory environments in physics education.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physics Education
Published
2026-01-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6552/ae2f14
Primary Topic
Biomedical and Engineering Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Unveiling gender dynamics in introductory physics labs

Bilas Paul
Physics Education
Biomedical and Engineering Education
article

Unveiling gender dynamics in introductory physics labs

Bilas Paul
article en

Abstract

Abstract The persistent underrepresentation of women and gender minorities within the physical sciences remains a significant issue. This study investigates gender dynamics in introductory algebra-based physics laboratories, focusing on participation, task preferences, and comfort levels. Statistical analysis revealed no significant gender difference in overall participation rates during lab activities. However, significant gender-based disparities emerged in both task preference [ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mrow> <mml:msup> <mml:mi>χ</mml:mi> <mml:mn>2</mml:mn> </mml:msup> <mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo> <mml:mrow> <mml:mtext mathvariant="italic">df</mml:mtext> </mml:mrow> <mml:mo>=</mml:mo> <mml:mn>3</mml:mn> <mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo> <mml:mo>=</mml:mo> <mml:mn>9.548</mml:mn> <mml:mo>,</mml:mo> <mml:mtext> </mml:mtext> <mml:mi>p</mml:mi> <mml:mo>=</mml:mo> <mml:mn>0.023</mml:mn> <mml:mo>,</mml:mo> <mml:mtext> </mml:mtext> <mml:mi>α</mml:mi> <mml:mo>=</mml:mo> <mml:mn>0.05</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> ] and comfort levels [ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mrow> <mml:msup> <mml:mi>χ</mml:mi> <mml:mn>2</mml:mn> </mml:msup> <mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo> <mml:mrow> <mml:mtext mathvariant="italic">df</mml:mtext> </mml:mrow> <mml:mo>=</mml:mo> <mml:mn>3</mml:mn> <mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo> <mml:mo>=</mml:mo> <mml:mn>7.906</mml:mn> <mml:mo>,</mml:mo> <mml:mtext> </mml:mtext> <mml:mi>p</mml:mi> <mml:mo>=</mml:mo> <mml:mn>0.048</mml:mn> <mml:mo>,</mml:mo> <mml:mtext> </mml:mtext> <mml:mi>α</mml:mi> <mml:mo>=</mml:mo> <mml:mn>0.05</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> ]. Male students significantly preferred and felt more comfortable with hands-on equipment handling and data collection, whereas female students more frequently preferred and reported higher comfort with analytical and documentation tasks like note-taking, calculations, and report writing. Qualitative responses highlighted additional challenges reported by some women, including exclusion from group discussions and reluctance to contribute ideas in male-dominated groups. These findings suggest that while overall participation may appear gender-neutral, gendered patterns in task allocation and comfort persist. The results underscore the need for instructional strategies that promote equitable engagement and foster inclusive laboratory environments in physics education.

Physics EducationVol. 61(1)
Farmingdale State College (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 100%
Biomedical and Engineering Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.