A Systematic Review of Voluntary Cybersecurity Standards and Frameworks

Abstract As the world becomes increasingly digitalised, cyber insecurity has become the monster under the bed, an unseen threat that many either remain unaware of or ignore, hoping it will simply vanish. In today’s digital landscape, nearly every individual with a digital footprint has, at some point, encountered spam calls or emails containing offers that appear too good to be true or attempt to induce fear and coerce them into parting with their money. Organisations of all sizes are on the front lines of this cyber war. A 2024 cybersecurity breaches survey by the UK Home Office found several organisations reported receiving countless phishing emails and other cyberattacks daily. This study evaluates and ranks the leading voluntary cybersecurity frameworks and standards based on their relevance and adoption in the academic and professional communities. A systematic review identified 12 voluntary cybersecurity frameworks and 17 cybersecurity standards. The top five frameworks and standards from each category were analysed, with the key components of each outlined in detail. The ranking system developed for this study was based on academic research interest, highlighting the cybersecurity measures most frequently studied and discussed in scholarly literature. The results provide a comprehensive overview of the most influential voluntary cybersecurity frameworks and standards, providing valuable insights for organisations seeking to improve their cybersecurity posture through voluntary measures. This study aimed to contribute to the ongoing discussion of how voluntary cybersecurity initiatives can complement regulatory efforts in safeguarding digital infrastructure.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Information Security
Published
2025-09-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10207-025-01121-0
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Network Security and Intrusion Detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.97
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Systematic Review of Voluntary Cybersecurity Standards and Frameworks

Blessing Reuben-Owoh, Ella Haig
2 citations
International Journal of Information Security
Network Security and Intrusion Detection
2.97
article

A Systematic Review of Voluntary Cybersecurity Standards and Frameworks

Blessing Reuben-Owoh, Ella Haig
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract As the world becomes increasingly digitalised, cyber insecurity has become the monster under the bed, an unseen threat that many either remain unaware of or ignore, hoping it will simply vanish. In today’s digital landscape, nearly every individual with a digital footprint has, at some point, encountered spam calls or emails containing offers that appear too good to be true or attempt to induce fear and coerce them into parting with their money. Organisations of all sizes are on the front lines of this cyber war. A 2024 cybersecurity breaches survey by the UK Home Office found several organisations reported receiving countless phishing emails and other cyberattacks daily. This study evaluates and ranks the leading voluntary cybersecurity frameworks and standards based on their relevance and adoption in the academic and professional communities. A systematic review identified 12 voluntary cybersecurity frameworks and 17 cybersecurity standards. The top five frameworks and standards from each category were analysed, with the key components of each outlined in detail. The ranking system developed for this study was based on academic research interest, highlighting the cybersecurity measures most frequently studied and discussed in scholarly literature. The results provide a comprehensive overview of the most influential voluntary cybersecurity frameworks and standards, providing valuable insights for organisations seeking to improve their cybersecurity posture through voluntary measures. This study aimed to contribute to the ongoing discussion of how voluntary cybersecurity initiatives can complement regulatory efforts in safeguarding digital infrastructure.

International Journal of Information SecurityVol. 24(5)
University of Portsmouth (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Network Security and Intrusion Detection
2.97
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.