African agency in geopolitical times: playing with EU and Chinese ontological security

In 2021 the European Union (EU) launched Global Gateway (GG). This new €300 billion European strategy is intended to boost the EU’s involvement in areas such as transport infrastructure, green energy, and digitalisation in developing countries. The African continent is expected to benefit with half of the expected figures. Much of the debate in the past few years has attempted to dissect the (geo)political, financial and economic dimensions of GG from the perspective of Brussels and EU Member States’ policymakers. However, very little has been discussed on how African policymakers have perceived GG. This paper will thus focus on African agency in the context of GG and the broader framework of Africa–EU relations. Moreover, it will compare this agency with that which has been displayed in the past decade of relations between Africa and China. Drawing on an ontological security analytical framework, the paper seeks to understand the new dynamics and contestations of African agency in the continent’s relations with the EU and China that have been ignored in both mainstream and critical approaches to EU foreign policy studies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Third World Quarterly
Published
2025-09-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2025.2551134
Citations
1
Primary Topic
International Development and Aid
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.45
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

African agency in geopolitical times: playing with EU and Chinese ontological security

Niall Duggan, John Hogan, Luís Pais Bernardo, Luís Mah et al.
1 citations
Third World Quarterly
International Development and Aid
3.45
article

African agency in geopolitical times: playing with EU and Chinese ontological security

Niall Duggan, John Hogan, Luís Pais Bernardo, Luís Mah, Toni Haastrup
article en
1 citations

Abstract

In 2021 the European Union (EU) launched Global Gateway (GG). This new €300 billion European strategy is intended to boost the EU’s involvement in areas such as transport infrastructure, green energy, and digitalisation in developing countries. The African continent is expected to benefit with half of the expected figures. Much of the debate in the past few years has attempted to dissect the (geo)political, financial and economic dimensions of GG from the perspective of Brussels and EU Member States’ policymakers. However, very little has been discussed on how African policymakers have perceived GG. This paper will thus focus on African agency in the context of GG and the broader framework of Africa–EU relations. Moreover, it will compare this agency with that which has been displayed in the past decade of relations between Africa and China. Drawing on an ontological security analytical framework, the paper seeks to understand the new dynamics and contestations of African agency in the continent’s relations with the EU and China that have been ignored in both mainstream and critical approaches to EU foreign policy studies.

Third World Quarterly
University of Lisbon (PT), University College Cork (IE), University of Manchester (GB), Iscte – Instituto Universitário de Lisboa (PT), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
International Development and Aid
3.45
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

African agency in geopolitical times: playing with EU and Chinese ontological security — Niall Duggan, John Hogan, et al. · Third World Quarterly (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS