BenchECG and xECG: a benchmark and baseline for ECG foundation models

Abstract Electrocardiograms (ECGs) are inexpensive, widely used, and well-suited to deep learning. Interest has grown in ECG foundation models that generalise across diverse downstream tasks. However, current evaluation rarely reflects the full capabilities expected of ECG foundation models, with prior work often using narrow task selections and inconsistent datasets, hindering fair comparison. We introduce BenchECG, the first standardised, open benchmark for rigorous ECG foundation model evaluation, comprising eight publicly available datasets (421,171 patients; 1,674,704 recordings). BenchECG assesses model performance across diverse signals, patient populations, and ten conceptually distinct tasks, spanning classification, detection, regression, survival analysis, and segmentation, including explicit out-of-distribution testing. It enables systematic comparison by measuring how well model representations transfer across tasks under controlled benchmark conditions. Alongside BenchECG, we propose xECG, an ECG foundation model combining the efficiency of xLSTM recurrent architecture (5x faster training than transformer baselines) with SimDINOv2 self-supervised learning. xECG achieves the highest BenchECG score (0.838) and best average rank (1.5 out of 5 models), outperforming current publicly available state-of-the-art methods and providing a strong baseline for future ECG foundation models.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
npj Digital Medicine
Published
2026-09-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-026-03196-y
Citations
1
Primary Topic
ECG Monitoring and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.39

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

BenchECG and xECG: a benchmark and baseline for ECG foundation models

Clemens Dlaska, Axel Bauer, Sebastian J. Reinstadler, Angus Nicolson et al.
1 citations
npj Digital Medicine
ECG Monitoring and Analysis
5.39
article

BenchECG and xECG: a benchmark and baseline for ECG foundation models

Clemens Dlaska, Axel Bauer, Sebastian J. Reinstadler, Angus Nicolson, Samuel Pröll, Riccardo Lunelli
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Electrocardiograms (ECGs) are inexpensive, widely used, and well-suited to deep learning. Interest has grown in ECG foundation models that generalise across diverse downstream tasks. However, current evaluation rarely reflects the full capabilities expected of ECG foundation models, with prior work often using narrow task selections and inconsistent datasets, hindering fair comparison. We introduce BenchECG, the first standardised, open benchmark for rigorous ECG foundation model evaluation, comprising eight publicly available datasets (421,171 patients; 1,674,704 recordings). BenchECG assesses model performance across diverse signals, patient populations, and ten conceptually distinct tasks, spanning classification, detection, regression, survival analysis, and segmentation, including explicit out-of-distribution testing. It enables systematic comparison by measuring how well model representations transfer across tasks under controlled benchmark conditions. Alongside BenchECG, we propose xECG, an ECG foundation model combining the efficiency of xLSTM recurrent architecture (5x faster training than transformer baselines) with SimDINOv2 self-supervised learning. xECG achieves the highest BenchECG score (0.838) and best average rank (1.5 out of 5 models), outperforming current publicly available state-of-the-art methods and providing a strong baseline for future ECG foundation models.

npj Digital Medicine
Innsbruck Medical University (AT), Universität Innsbruck (AT)
Medizinische Universität Innsbruck, Universität Innsbruck
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
ECG Monitoring and Analysis
5.39
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.