Self-rated health and mental health before and during the early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic in Germany: the population-based German National Cohort (NAKO) study (Preprint)

<sec> <title>BACKGROUND</title> The COVID-19 pandemic and accompanying social distancing measures might have caused adverse health consequences. </sec> <sec> <title>OBJECTIVE</title> To describe changes in participants’ self-rated health and mental health (depression, anxiety, and stress), and investigate factors associated with them. </sec> <sec> <title>METHODS</title> We collected data from the German National Cohort (NAKO). We first described changes in participants’ self-rated health and mental health from the baseline examination (1 to 6 years earlier) to the early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic. We then applied the multinomial logistic regression model (self-rated health) and the quantile regression model (mental health) to investigate the potential factors associated with the health status and changes. </sec> <sec> <title>RESULTS</title> : After a median of 3.1 [2.1, 4.1] years from baseline to the early pandemic phase, 39.3% of participants (N = 91,809) with good health and 69.7% with less good health status at baseline reported better health. However, the percentage of participants with high depression, anxiety, and stress scores (≥10) increased from 6.2%, 4.1%, and 4.3% to 8.6%, 5.6%, and 10.1%, respectively. In the multivariable models, we found that being younger, being male, highly educated, being employed, having higher life satisfaction at baseline, being more physically active, drinking heavily, and experiencing improved anxiety symptoms were associated with improved self-rated health. In contrast, smoking and having mental health disorders were all associated with worse self-rated health. Our results showed that being younger, being female, smoking, drinking heavily, and drinking more since baseline were associated with higher depression scores. Having had a coronavirus test was associated with worse self-rated health and more severe anxiety and stress. </sec> <sec> <title>CONCLUSIONS</title> During the early COVID-19 pandemic, many participants experienced improvements in self-rated health but suffered deterioration in mental health and physical activity engagement. Female participants, those who were physically inactive, and those with pre-existing mental disorders were more likely to report poorer health. </sec>

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2025-09-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2196/preprints.85022
Primary Topic
COVID-19 and Mental Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Self-rated health and mental health before and during the early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic in Germany: the population-based German National Cohort (NAKO) study (Preprint)

Susanne Rospleszcz, Claudia Meinke‐Franze, Carolina Judith Klett-Tammen, Wolfgang Ahrens et al.
COVID-19 and Mental Health
article

Self-rated health and mental health before and during the early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic in Germany: the population-based German National Cohort (NAKO) study (Preprint)

Susanne Rospleszcz, Claudia Meinke‐Franze, Carolina Judith Klett-Tammen, Wolfgang Ahrens, Ilais Moreno Velásquez, Rudolf Kaaks, Michael F. Leitzmann, Tamara Schikowski, Markus Löffler, Börge Schmidt, Volker Harth, Muhammad Nasir Khan Khattak, Matthias Bernd Schulze, Hajo Zeeb, Bernd Holleczek, Tobias Pischon, Klaus Berger, Oliver Kuß, Nadia Obi, Janka Massag, Yue Xi, Hermann Brenner, Andreas Stang, Rafael Mikolajczyk, Beate Fischer, Lilian Krist, André Karch, Annette Peters, Anne Sophie Hallet, Wolfgang Lieb, Alexandra Nieters, Thomas Keil, Till Bärnighausen
article en

Abstract

<sec> <title>BACKGROUND</title> The COVID-19 pandemic and accompanying social distancing measures might have caused adverse health consequences. </sec> <sec> <title>OBJECTIVE</title> To describe changes in participants’ self-rated health and mental health (depression, anxiety, and stress), and investigate factors associated with them. </sec> <sec> <title>METHODS</title> We collected data from the German National Cohort (NAKO). We first described changes in participants’ self-rated health and mental health from the baseline examination (1 to 6 years earlier) to the early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic. We then applied the multinomial logistic regression model (self-rated health) and the quantile regression model (mental health) to investigate the potential factors associated with the health status and changes. </sec> <sec> <title>RESULTS</title> : After a median of 3.1 [2.1, 4.1] years from baseline to the early pandemic phase, 39.3% of participants (N = 91,809) with good health and 69.7% with less good health status at baseline reported better health. However, the percentage of participants with high depression, anxiety, and stress scores (≥10) increased from 6.2%, 4.1%, and 4.3% to 8.6%, 5.6%, and 10.1%, respectively. In the multivariable models, we found that being younger, being male, highly educated, being employed, having higher life satisfaction at baseline, being more physically active, drinking heavily, and experiencing improved anxiety symptoms were associated with improved self-rated health. In contrast, smoking and having mental health disorders were all associated with worse self-rated health. Our results showed that being younger, being female, smoking, drinking heavily, and drinking more since baseline were associated with higher depression scores. Having had a coronavirus test was associated with worse self-rated health and more severe anxiety and stress. </sec> <sec> <title>CONCLUSIONS</title> During the early COVID-19 pandemic, many participants experienced improvements in self-rated health but suffered deterioration in mental health and physical activity engagement. Female participants, those who were physically inactive, and those with pre-existing mental disorders were more likely to report poorer health. </sec>

Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
COVID-19 and Mental Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.