Peripheral articulations of world literature: de-westernizing a discipline in Soviet Russia and beyond

Abstract This article reviews Galin Tihanov, Anne Lounsbery, and Rossen Djagalov’s recent book, World Literature in the Soviet Union (2023). It discusses the ways in which Soviet world literature became a distinct literary field through socialist internationalism starting in the 1920s, proposing a different understanding of Weltliteratur and enacting different patterns of literary production, circulation, and transnational consecration than those enshrined in Western-centric models of world literature. I highlight the role of nation-building within the USSR, as well as in Soviet networking with the newly decolonized world post-WWII. I situate the work of Soviet intellectuals in the broader context of contemporary theoretical debates about world literature and postcolonial studies, and argue that their perspective on the historical function of literature might help us address some of our disciplinary crises today. Finally, I suggest that the same kind of research should be carried out into South-Eastern subperipheral literatures such as Romanian and Bulgarian literature.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Studies in East European Thought
Published
2025-09-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11212-025-09767-1
Primary Topic
Translation Studies and Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Peripheral articulations of world literature: de-westernizing a discipline in Soviet Russia and beyond

Maria Chiorean
Studies in East European Thought
Translation Studies and Practices
article

Peripheral articulations of world literature: de-westernizing a discipline in Soviet Russia and beyond

Maria Chiorean
article en

Abstract

Abstract This article reviews Galin Tihanov, Anne Lounsbery, and Rossen Djagalov’s recent book, World Literature in the Soviet Union (2023). It discusses the ways in which Soviet world literature became a distinct literary field through socialist internationalism starting in the 1920s, proposing a different understanding of Weltliteratur and enacting different patterns of literary production, circulation, and transnational consecration than those enshrined in Western-centric models of world literature. I highlight the role of nation-building within the USSR, as well as in Soviet networking with the newly decolonized world post-WWII. I situate the work of Soviet intellectuals in the broader context of contemporary theoretical debates about world literature and postcolonial studies, and argue that their perspective on the historical function of literature might help us address some of our disciplinary crises today. Finally, I suggest that the same kind of research should be carried out into South-Eastern subperipheral literatures such as Romanian and Bulgarian literature.

Studies in East European ThoughtVol. 78(3)
Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu (RO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Translation Studies and Practices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Peripheral articulations of world literature: de-westernizing a discipline in Soviet Russia and beyond — Maria Chiorean · Studies in East European Thought (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS