Explicating explicit reflection in nature of science education: a systematic literature review

For over two decades, “explicit reflection” has been a cornerstone concept in Nature of Science education. Many studies underscore the crucial role of Explicit Reflection in effective Nature of Science education, yet its ubiquity is accompanied by ambiguity in its definition and application. In this study, the aim is to comprehensively map the evolving meanings of Explicit Reflection in Nature of Science education. Conducting a systematic review, articles providing definitions for Explicit Reflection in Nature of Science education between 2000 and 2023, were examined following PRISMA guidelines. 61 definitions that adhered to our predefined criteria were systematically identified and selected. Subsequently, a data analysis process was conducted involving both discourse analysis and thematic synthesis. Using discourse analysis, both persistent themes and evolving patterns were identified, shedding light on the dynamic character of Explicit Reflection within the context of Nature of Science education. In parallel, during the thematic synthesis, a taxonomy of 25 descriptive themes was developed and further distilled into four analytical categories. These four key analytical themes encompass: “the meaning of explicit”, “the meaning of reflection”, “learning environment” and “cognitive process dimensions”. Two types of Explicit Reflection: the student-centered and teacher-centered types, were constructed. From these, student-centered definitions of Explicit Reflection incorporate higher cognitive process dimensions and offer a more comprehensive definition. In conclusion, this study clarifies the multifaceted nature of Explicit Reflection in Nature of Science education, providing a nuanced framework that distinguishes between student-centered and teacher-centered approaches. By offering a detailed taxonomy and highlighting the cognitive depth of student-centered definitions, this work lays the groundwork for more precise implementation and future research in Nature of Science pedagogy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Education
Published
2025-09-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1577021
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Science Education and Pedagogy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.93

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Explicating explicit reflection in nature of science education: a systematic literature review

Rianne Pinxten, Jelle De Schrijver, Peter Van Petegem, Lotte Boven
1 citations
Frontiers in Education
Science Education and Pedagogy
8.93
article

Explicating explicit reflection in nature of science education: a systematic literature review

Rianne Pinxten, Jelle De Schrijver, Peter Van Petegem, Lotte Boven
article en
1 citations

Abstract

For over two decades, “explicit reflection” has been a cornerstone concept in Nature of Science education. Many studies underscore the crucial role of Explicit Reflection in effective Nature of Science education, yet its ubiquity is accompanied by ambiguity in its definition and application. In this study, the aim is to comprehensively map the evolving meanings of Explicit Reflection in Nature of Science education. Conducting a systematic review, articles providing definitions for Explicit Reflection in Nature of Science education between 2000 and 2023, were examined following PRISMA guidelines. 61 definitions that adhered to our predefined criteria were systematically identified and selected. Subsequently, a data analysis process was conducted involving both discourse analysis and thematic synthesis. Using discourse analysis, both persistent themes and evolving patterns were identified, shedding light on the dynamic character of Explicit Reflection within the context of Nature of Science education. In parallel, during the thematic synthesis, a taxonomy of 25 descriptive themes was developed and further distilled into four analytical categories. These four key analytical themes encompass: “the meaning of explicit”, “the meaning of reflection”, “learning environment” and “cognitive process dimensions”. Two types of Explicit Reflection: the student-centered and teacher-centered types, were constructed. From these, student-centered definitions of Explicit Reflection incorporate higher cognitive process dimensions and offer a more comprehensive definition. In conclusion, this study clarifies the multifaceted nature of Explicit Reflection in Nature of Science education, providing a nuanced framework that distinguishes between student-centered and teacher-centered approaches. By offering a detailed taxonomy and highlighting the cognitive depth of student-centered definitions, this work lays the groundwork for more precise implementation and future research in Nature of Science pedagogy.

Frontiers in EducationVol. 10
University of Antwerp (BE), Ghent University (BE), Odisee, University of Applied Sciences (BE)
Universiteit Antwerpen
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Science Education and Pedagogy
8.93
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.