Correlation Metrics for Safe Artificial Intelligence

There is a growing need to provide AI risk management models that can assess whether AI applications are safe and trustworthy, to make them responsible. To date, there are a few research papers on this topic. To fill the gap, in this paper we extend the recently proposed SAFE framework, a comprehensive approach to measure AI risks across four key dimensions: security, accuracy, fairness, and explainability (SAFE). We contribute to the SAFE framework with a novel use of the coefficient of determination (R2) to quantify deviations from ideal behavior not only in terms of accuracy but also for security, fairness, and explainability. Our empirical findings shows the effectiveness of the proposal, which leads to a more precise measurement of risks of AI regression applications, which involve the prediction of continuous response variables.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Risks
Published
2025-09-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/risks13090178
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.48
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Correlation Metrics for Safe Artificial Intelligence

Golnoosh Babaei, Paolo Giudici
1 citations
Risks
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
2.48
article

Correlation Metrics for Safe Artificial Intelligence

Golnoosh Babaei, Paolo Giudici
article en
1 citations

Abstract

There is a growing need to provide AI risk management models that can assess whether AI applications are safe and trustworthy, to make them responsible. To date, there are a few research papers on this topic. To fill the gap, in this paper we extend the recently proposed SAFE framework, a comprehensive approach to measure AI risks across four key dimensions: security, accuracy, fairness, and explainability (SAFE). We contribute to the SAFE framework with a novel use of the coefficient of determination (R2) to quantify deviations from ideal behavior not only in terms of accuracy but also for security, fairness, and explainability. Our empirical findings shows the effectiveness of the proposal, which leads to a more precise measurement of risks of AI regression applications, which involve the prediction of continuous response variables.

RisksVol. 13(9)
University of Pavia (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
2.48
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.