A study on factors influencing decision - making conflicts of proxies of thrombolytic patients with acute ischemic stroke: a network analysis

In China, the informed consent for thrombolysis in patients with AIS tends to be primarily signed by proxy decision-makers, generally for the family members of patients. The decision-making process is considerably influenced by various factors, including environmental conditions, individual characteristics, and clinical contexts, all of which exhibit substantial effects on the quality and efficiency of the decision-making process. To conduct an in-depth analysis of the core and bridging factors that influence the decision-making processes of proxy decision-makers, aimed at establishing a foundation for the development of targeted decision support interventions. A cross-sectional study was conducted from January 2024 to December 2024, involving the recruitment of volunteers from the Emergency Department of a tertiary hospital. The Cognitive Appraisal Orientation Test (CAOT), State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI), Chinese version of the Decisional Conflict Scale (C-DCS), Wake Forest Physician Trust Scale (WFPTS), and Perceived Social Support Scale (SSS) were employed to evaluate the effects of the individual and environmental factors. Additionally, network analysis was applied in the visualization of the interrelationships among these variables, alongside the analysis of the pertinent indicators of the network structure. 855 valid questionnaires were obtained for subsequent analysis. Within the network structure, the value clarity dimension of C-DCS (C-DCS-val) (rs = 17.313, rc = 0.095) exhibited the highest strength and closeness centrality. Specifically, C-DCS-val from the C-DCS, the benevolent dimension of WFPTS (WFPTS-love) (rs = 11.421, rc = 0.088) from the WFPTS, and the positive dimension of CAOT (CAOT-pos) (rs = 8.312, rc = 0.067) from the CAOT were identified to exhibit the greatest strength centrality within their respective clusters. Additionally, WFPTS-love could function as a bridging factor between the multiple clusters within the network structure. C-DCS-val serves as the central determinant, while WFPTS-love functions as the bridge that influences the decision-making process. This study highlights the critical role of healthcare professionals in aiding proxy decision-makers to clarify value preferences, alongside the enhancement of the effectiveness of their communication strategies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
Published
2025-09-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-025-03187-1
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Mental Health Research Topics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.12

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A study on factors influencing decision - making conflicts of proxies of thrombolytic patients with acute ischemic stroke: a network analysis

Yuanli Guo, Yanjin Liu, Wenfeng Fan, Keke Ma et al.
1 citations
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
Mental Health Research Topics
2.12
article

A study on factors influencing decision - making conflicts of proxies of thrombolytic patients with acute ischemic stroke: a network analysis

Yuanli Guo, Yanjin Liu, Wenfeng Fan, Keke Ma, Peihua Lv, Lina Guo, Dazhen Li, Caixia Yang, Renke Gao, Dong Xiaofang
article en
1 citations

Abstract

In China, the informed consent for thrombolysis in patients with AIS tends to be primarily signed by proxy decision-makers, generally for the family members of patients. The decision-making process is considerably influenced by various factors, including environmental conditions, individual characteristics, and clinical contexts, all of which exhibit substantial effects on the quality and efficiency of the decision-making process. To conduct an in-depth analysis of the core and bridging factors that influence the decision-making processes of proxy decision-makers, aimed at establishing a foundation for the development of targeted decision support interventions. A cross-sectional study was conducted from January 2024 to December 2024, involving the recruitment of volunteers from the Emergency Department of a tertiary hospital. The Cognitive Appraisal Orientation Test (CAOT), State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI), Chinese version of the Decisional Conflict Scale (C-DCS), Wake Forest Physician Trust Scale (WFPTS), and Perceived Social Support Scale (SSS) were employed to evaluate the effects of the individual and environmental factors. Additionally, network analysis was applied in the visualization of the interrelationships among these variables, alongside the analysis of the pertinent indicators of the network structure. 855 valid questionnaires were obtained for subsequent analysis. Within the network structure, the value clarity dimension of C-DCS (C-DCS-val) (rs = 17.313, rc = 0.095) exhibited the highest strength and closeness centrality. Specifically, C-DCS-val from the C-DCS, the benevolent dimension of WFPTS (WFPTS-love) (rs = 11.421, rc = 0.088) from the WFPTS, and the positive dimension of CAOT (CAOT-pos) (rs = 8.312, rc = 0.067) from the CAOT were identified to exhibit the greatest strength centrality within their respective clusters. Additionally, WFPTS-love could function as a bridging factor between the multiple clusters within the network structure. C-DCS-val serves as the central determinant, while WFPTS-love functions as the bridge that influences the decision-making process. This study highlights the critical role of healthcare professionals in aiding proxy decision-makers to clarify value preferences, alongside the enhancement of the effectiveness of their communication strategies.

BMC Medical Informatics and Decision MakingVol. 25(1)
Zhengzhou University (CN), First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University (CN)
Zhengzhou University, First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Mental Health Research Topics
2.12
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.