The Field Cultivation Index, a New Method for Assessing Agricultural Practices’ Sustainability and Moving Towards Regenerative Agriculture—Application to Cosmetic Supply Chains

Utilizing more bioresources exposes supply chains to agricultural risks. Therefore, sustainable agricultural practices are crucial for supporting a resilient transition. This requires tools for assessing the environmental performance of cropping systems. However, most existing tools are not adapted to the operational realities of, for example, cosmetics supply chains. The Field Cultivation Index (FCI) has been developed with a threefold aim: 1. assess cropping systems’ strengths and weaknesses and guide their improvement; 2. compare cropping systems to identify the most environmentally friendly; 3. promote initiatives and efforts made to improve sustainability. It also meets the requirements for tackling the specific operational challenges of global industries like cosmetics: it is (i) simple (data collection is easy and straightforward), (ii) deployable in all regions of the world (with a diversity of soils, climates, etc.), and (iii) adaptable to all cropping systems (industrial, family, etc.) and all plant species (perennials, annuals, etc.). Its methodology is based on scientifically recognized evaluation methods and economic operator initiatives. It is built around a theoretical framework embodying the concepts of regenerative agriculture, enabling the qualitative assessment of the impact of cropping systems on five main regenerative environmental outcomes: soil quality improvement water resource conservation biodiversity enhancement, pesticide reduction, and carbon emission mitigation. This article describes the FCI methodology and reveals initial results from the evaluation of about 40 diversified cropping systems. It demonstrates that the FCI is an operational, sensitive, and educational tool capable of determining the performance level of diversified cropping systems, while highlighting the need for a high level of regenerative practice deployment to achieve satisfactory scores. The tool supports farmers and supply chains in assessing and improving the environmental profile of agricultural production systems in line with sustainability goals. Finally, this paper discusses the benefits, limitations, and potential uses of this tool for monitoring the environmental impact of cropping systems within cosmetics supply chains.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sustainability
Published
2025-09-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/su17188223
Primary Topic
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Field Cultivation Index, a New Method for Assessing Agricultural Practices’ Sustainability and Moving Towards Regenerative Agriculture—Application to Cosmetic Supply Chains

Sydney Girard, Bernard Lacroix, Mathieu Bayot, Miluska Carrasco et al.
Sustainability
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
article

The Field Cultivation Index, a New Method for Assessing Agricultural Practices’ Sustainability and Moving Towards Regenerative Agriculture—Application to Cosmetic Supply Chains

Sydney Girard, Bernard Lacroix, Mathieu Bayot, Miluska Carrasco, Delphine Bouvier, Elsa Ogé, Aurore Dieu, David Hazoumé
article en

Abstract

Utilizing more bioresources exposes supply chains to agricultural risks. Therefore, sustainable agricultural practices are crucial for supporting a resilient transition. This requires tools for assessing the environmental performance of cropping systems. However, most existing tools are not adapted to the operational realities of, for example, cosmetics supply chains. The Field Cultivation Index (FCI) has been developed with a threefold aim: 1. assess cropping systems’ strengths and weaknesses and guide their improvement; 2. compare cropping systems to identify the most environmentally friendly; 3. promote initiatives and efforts made to improve sustainability. It also meets the requirements for tackling the specific operational challenges of global industries like cosmetics: it is (i) simple (data collection is easy and straightforward), (ii) deployable in all regions of the world (with a diversity of soils, climates, etc.), and (iii) adaptable to all cropping systems (industrial, family, etc.) and all plant species (perennials, annuals, etc.). Its methodology is based on scientifically recognized evaluation methods and economic operator initiatives. It is built around a theoretical framework embodying the concepts of regenerative agriculture, enabling the qualitative assessment of the impact of cropping systems on five main regenerative environmental outcomes: soil quality improvement water resource conservation biodiversity enhancement, pesticide reduction, and carbon emission mitigation. This article describes the FCI methodology and reveals initial results from the evaluation of about 40 diversified cropping systems. It demonstrates that the FCI is an operational, sensitive, and educational tool capable of determining the performance level of diversified cropping systems, while highlighting the need for a high level of regenerative practice deployment to achieve satisfactory scores. The tool supports farmers and supply chains in assessing and improving the environmental profile of agricultural production systems in line with sustainability goals. Finally, this paper discusses the benefits, limitations, and potential uses of this tool for monitoring the environmental impact of cropping systems within cosmetics supply chains.

SustainabilityVol. 17(18)
L'Oréal (France) (FR), Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement (FR), Institut de Technologie Alimentaire (SN), UMR BIOdiversity, GEnes & Communities (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.