Laser Resurfacing Versus Chemical Peels: A Review of Current Trends and Technological Advances in Nonsurgical Facial Rejuvenation

Recent decades have seen a rapid advancement in nonsurgical facial rejuvenation techniques due to technological advances and growing patient preference for minimally invasive aesthetic procedures. Laser resurfacing and chemical peels are two popular modalities that address aging skin, improve skin texture, and reduce signs of photodamage. In this work, we examine the historical evolution of these modalities, review current trends, and analyze their comparative efficacy in the context of facial rejuvenation. We discuss each modalities’ mechanisms, clinical indications, efficacy, and safety profiles. We additionally explore the impact of emerging technologies, such as fractional lasers, picosecond lasers, and novel chemical peel formulations, on patient outcomes, recovery times, and novel indications. Furthermore, we consider how recent advances have enabled safer and more effective treatment across diverse skin types, focusing primarily on higher Fitzpatrick skin. Additionally, a scoping review including adjunctive and non-surgical modalities is discussed and synthesized to highlight current evidence, clinical guidelines, and technological advances. This review aims to guide clinicians in optimizing procedure choice and patient outcomes in nonsurgical facial rejuvenation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Aesthetic Medicine
Published
2025-09-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jaestheticmed1010005
Primary Topic
Dermatologic Treatments and Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Laser Resurfacing Versus Chemical Peels: A Review of Current Trends and Technological Advances in Nonsurgical Facial Rejuvenation

Miguel I. Dorante, Susanna Gebhardt, Miranda X. Morris, Joseph N. Tingen et al.
Journal of Aesthetic Medicine
Dermatologic Treatments and Research
article

Laser Resurfacing Versus Chemical Peels: A Review of Current Trends and Technological Advances in Nonsurgical Facial Rejuvenation

Miguel I. Dorante, Susanna Gebhardt, Miranda X. Morris, Joseph N. Tingen, Sonal Pandya
article en

Abstract

Recent decades have seen a rapid advancement in nonsurgical facial rejuvenation techniques due to technological advances and growing patient preference for minimally invasive aesthetic procedures. Laser resurfacing and chemical peels are two popular modalities that address aging skin, improve skin texture, and reduce signs of photodamage. In this work, we examine the historical evolution of these modalities, review current trends, and analyze their comparative efficacy in the context of facial rejuvenation. We discuss each modalities’ mechanisms, clinical indications, efficacy, and safety profiles. We additionally explore the impact of emerging technologies, such as fractional lasers, picosecond lasers, and novel chemical peel formulations, on patient outcomes, recovery times, and novel indications. Furthermore, we consider how recent advances have enabled safer and more effective treatment across diverse skin types, focusing primarily on higher Fitzpatrick skin. Additionally, a scoping review including adjunctive and non-surgical modalities is discussed and synthesized to highlight current evidence, clinical guidelines, and technological advances. This review aims to guide clinicians in optimizing procedure choice and patient outcomes in nonsurgical facial rejuvenation.

Journal of Aesthetic MedicineVol. 1(1)
Tufts University (US), Lahey Hospital and Medical Center (US), Lahey Medical Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Dermatologic Treatments and Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.