Integrating British Sign Language into deaf education

This article argues for the integration of British Sign Language (BSL) into the core of deaf education in England. Despite progress in early identification and intervention, deaf pupils continue to experience educational disadvantage, with persistent attainment gaps compared to their hearing peers. Current policy remains rooted in a medicalised model of deafness, with BSL marginalised in favour of speech and audiological interventions. The authors identify five key challenges: the dominance of disability frameworks over language rights; the medicalisation of deaf education; the exclusion of BSL from the National Curriculum; the impact of socio-economic inequality; and weak assessment arrangements. The paper explores how meaningful integration of BSL would look, including the adoption of the BSL Curriculum, the rollout of the BSL GCSE, workforce development for BSL teachers, and reform of assessment practices. Drawing on policy reviews, attainment data, and practitioner insights, the authors show how a bilingual model, placing BSL on an equal footing with English, can support improved outcomes for deaf pupils and enrich learning for hearing peers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Language Learning Journal
Published
2025-09-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2025.2554235
Primary Topic
Hearing Impairment and Communication
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Integrating British Sign Language into deaf education

Rob Wilks, Rachel O’Neill
Language Learning Journal
Hearing Impairment and Communication
article

Integrating British Sign Language into deaf education

Rob Wilks, Rachel O’Neill
article en

Abstract

This article argues for the integration of British Sign Language (BSL) into the core of deaf education in England. Despite progress in early identification and intervention, deaf pupils continue to experience educational disadvantage, with persistent attainment gaps compared to their hearing peers. Current policy remains rooted in a medicalised model of deafness, with BSL marginalised in favour of speech and audiological interventions. The authors identify five key challenges: the dominance of disability frameworks over language rights; the medicalisation of deaf education; the exclusion of BSL from the National Curriculum; the impact of socio-economic inequality; and weak assessment arrangements. The paper explores how meaningful integration of BSL would look, including the adoption of the BSL Curriculum, the rollout of the BSL GCSE, workforce development for BSL teachers, and reform of assessment practices. Drawing on policy reviews, attainment data, and practitioner insights, the authors show how a bilingual model, placing BSL on an equal footing with English, can support improved outcomes for deaf pupils and enrich learning for hearing peers.

Language Learning JournalVol. 54(1)
University of the West of England (GB), University of Edinburgh (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Hearing Impairment and Communication
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.