Breaking the Iron Rice Bowl: Tenure-Track Systems and the Rise of Academic Innovation in China

Abstract This study leverages personnel system reforms within economics departments at Chinese universities to assess the impact of the tenure-track system on research productivity. Using individual-level data on faculty members, we show that tenure-track faculty produce 0.135 (or 100%) more publications in high-quality journals annually during their probationary period compared to faculty hired under the traditional personnel system. Our findings suggest that this increase in productivity is driven by the recruitment of high-potential researchers, heightened pressure due to performance-based employment risks and enhanced incentives, including higher salaries and increased research funding. Moreover, we observe that the varied implementation details influence the actual effects of the reform. Overall, the university tenure-track reform has been a significant contributor to the increased productivity in Chinese economic research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Economic Journal
Published
2025-09-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ej/ueaf093
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Higher Education Governance and Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
25.57
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Breaking the Iron Rice Bowl: Tenure-Track Systems and the Rise of Academic Innovation in China

Qingfeng Liu, Jianwei Xing, Wei Huang, Shilin Zheng
3 citations
The Economic Journal
Higher Education Governance and Development
25.57
article

Breaking the Iron Rice Bowl: Tenure-Track Systems and the Rise of Academic Innovation in China

Qingfeng Liu, Jianwei Xing, Wei Huang, Shilin Zheng
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Abstract This study leverages personnel system reforms within economics departments at Chinese universities to assess the impact of the tenure-track system on research productivity. Using individual-level data on faculty members, we show that tenure-track faculty produce 0.135 (or 100%) more publications in high-quality journals annually during their probationary period compared to faculty hired under the traditional personnel system. Our findings suggest that this increase in productivity is driven by the recruitment of high-potential researchers, heightened pressure due to performance-based employment risks and enhanced incentives, including higher salaries and increased research funding. Moreover, we observe that the varied implementation details influence the actual effects of the reform. Overall, the university tenure-track reform has been a significant contributor to the increased productivity in Chinese economic research.

The Economic Journal
King University (US), Chinese Academy of Social Sciences (CN), Peking University (CN), Institute of Quantitative and Technical Economics (CN), Tsinghua University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Higher Education Governance and Development
25.57
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Breaking the Iron Rice Bowl: Tenure-Track Systems and the Rise of Academic Innovation in China — Qingfeng Liu, Jianwei Xing, et al. · The Economic Journal (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS