Kelulut Honey-Incorporated Hybrid Gelatin-PVA Hydrogel for Wound Healing: Fabrication and In Vitro Characterization

Hydrogels are attractive biomaterials for skin replacement and tissue regeneration, offering advantages over split-skin grafts for large or irregular wounds. Honey-containing hydrogels are of particular interest, combining honey's natural healing properties with the versatility of hydrogel matrices. This study aimed to develop a biocompatible, biodegradable, and mechanically stable hydrogel as a cutaneous substitute. To achieve this, different formulations were prepared using gelatin (GE), polyvinyl alcohol (PVA), and Kelulut honey (KH). The formulations were designated as: GE-PVA (6% (<i>w</i>/<i>v</i>) GE: 5% (<i>w</i>/<i>v</i>) PVA, without KH), GE-PVA-H1 (containing 1% (<i>v</i>/<i>v</i>) KH), GE-PVA-H5 (containing 5% (<i>v</i>/<i>v</i>) KH), and GE-PVA-H10 (containing 10% (<i>v</i>/<i>v</i>) KH). All formulations were crosslinked with 0.1% (<i>w</i>/<i>v</i>) genipin (GNP). GE-PVA-H1 and GE-PVA-H1-GNP showed swelling ratios of 110.18 ± 20.14% and 86.31 ± 14.27%, lower than GE-PVA-H5 (125.79 ± 23.76%), GE-PVA-H10 (132.79 ± 20.86%), and their crosslinked counterparts. All formulations had WVTR <1500 g/m<sup>-2</sup>h<sup>-1</sup>, with GE-PVA-H1-GNP at 501.21 ± 41.35 g/m<sup>-2</sup>h<sup>-1</sup>, GE-PVA-H5-GNP at 473.77 ± 44.10 g/m<sup>-2</sup>h<sup>-1</sup>, and GE-PVA-H10-GNP at 467.51 ± 73.59 g/m<sup>-2</sup>h<sup>-1</sup>. GE-PVA-H1-GNP exhibited the slowest biodegradation (0.0036 ± 0.0003 g/h vs. 0.0096-0.0206 g/h for other groups). Contact angle was lowest for GE-PVA-H1-GNP (38.46° ± 3.89°), confirming higher hydrophilicity compared with GE-PVA-H5/H10 groups. Resilience (98.85% ± 1.03%) and compression strength (77.42% ± 7.17%) of GE-PVA-H1-GNP were comparable to GE-PVA-H5-GNP and GE-PVA-H10-GNP. MTT assays confirmed cytocompatibility across all groups. Collectively, GE-PVA-H1-GNP emerged as the optimal formulation, combining mechanical stability, hydrophilicity, and biocompatibility for wound healing applications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Polymers
Published
2025-09-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/polym17192618
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.79

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Kelulut Honey-Incorporated Hybrid Gelatin-PVA Hydrogel for Wound Healing: Fabrication and In Vitro Characterization

Manira Maarof, Nur Izzah Md Fadilah, Ebrahim Mahmoudi, Mh Busra Fauzi et al.
3 citations
Polymers
Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications
1.79
article

Kelulut Honey-Incorporated Hybrid Gelatin-PVA Hydrogel for Wound Healing: Fabrication and In Vitro Characterization

Manira Maarof, Nur Izzah Md Fadilah, Ebrahim Mahmoudi, Mh Busra Fauzi, Azalina Zainuddin, Yang‐Hee Kim, Raniya Razif, Aifa Asyhira Khairul Nizam
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Hydrogels are attractive biomaterials for skin replacement and tissue regeneration, offering advantages over split-skin grafts for large or irregular wounds. Honey-containing hydrogels are of particular interest, combining honey's natural healing properties with the versatility of hydrogel matrices. This study aimed to develop a biocompatible, biodegradable, and mechanically stable hydrogel as a cutaneous substitute. To achieve this, different formulations were prepared using gelatin (GE), polyvinyl alcohol (PVA), and Kelulut honey (KH). The formulations were designated as: GE-PVA (6% (<i>w</i>/<i>v</i>) GE: 5% (<i>w</i>/<i>v</i>) PVA, without KH), GE-PVA-H1 (containing 1% (<i>v</i>/<i>v</i>) KH), GE-PVA-H5 (containing 5% (<i>v</i>/<i>v</i>) KH), and GE-PVA-H10 (containing 10% (<i>v</i>/<i>v</i>) KH). All formulations were crosslinked with 0.1% (<i>w</i>/<i>v</i>) genipin (GNP). GE-PVA-H1 and GE-PVA-H1-GNP showed swelling ratios of 110.18 ± 20.14% and 86.31 ± 14.27%, lower than GE-PVA-H5 (125.79 ± 23.76%), GE-PVA-H10 (132.79 ± 20.86%), and their crosslinked counterparts. All formulations had WVTR <1500 g/m<sup>-2</sup>h<sup>-1</sup>, with GE-PVA-H1-GNP at 501.21 ± 41.35 g/m<sup>-2</sup>h<sup>-1</sup>, GE-PVA-H5-GNP at 473.77 ± 44.10 g/m<sup>-2</sup>h<sup>-1</sup>, and GE-PVA-H10-GNP at 467.51 ± 73.59 g/m<sup>-2</sup>h<sup>-1</sup>. GE-PVA-H1-GNP exhibited the slowest biodegradation (0.0036 ± 0.0003 g/h vs. 0.0096-0.0206 g/h for other groups). Contact angle was lowest for GE-PVA-H1-GNP (38.46° ± 3.89°), confirming higher hydrophilicity compared with GE-PVA-H5/H10 groups. Resilience (98.85% ± 1.03%) and compression strength (77.42% ± 7.17%) of GE-PVA-H1-GNP were comparable to GE-PVA-H5-GNP and GE-PVA-H10-GNP. MTT assays confirmed cytocompatibility across all groups. Collectively, GE-PVA-H1-GNP emerged as the optimal formulation, combining mechanical stability, hydrophilicity, and biocompatibility for wound healing applications.

PolymersVol. 17(19)
University of Southampton (GB), National University of Malaysia (MY)
Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications
1.79
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.