Por uma Abordagem Decolonial das Teorias da Prática: crítica à ontologia plana e às ausências onto-epistêmicas

In this essay, I propose a decolonial approach to Practice Theories by highlighting the epistemological and ontological blind spots of dominant Anglo-Eurocentric perspectives. While current Practice Theories have contributed to dismantling dualisms and rethinking agency, they often neglect the colonial histories, power asymmetries, and intersectional dynamics through which social practices emerge and are sustained. Exploring the analytical limitations of flat ontology reveals how the assumption of ontological symmetry can obscure the historical and geopolitical conditions of knowledge production. Rather than rejecting Practice Theories, this essay repositions them within a broader decolonial horizon by suggesting inspiration from the concepts of border and insurgent ontologies. This onto-epistemic orientation allows scholars to interrogate not only how practices unfold, but also who is authorized to practice, under what conditions, and with what consequences. I conclude with a set of guiding questions to support empirical research that embraces historicity, power relations, conflict, and epistemic diversity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-09-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1590/scielopreprints.13299
Primary Topic
Management and Organizational Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Por uma Abordagem Decolonial das Teorias da Prática: crítica à ontologia plana e às ausências onto-epistêmicas

Marcelo de Souza Bispo
Management and Organizational Studies
article

Por uma Abordagem Decolonial das Teorias da Prática: crítica à ontologia plana e às ausências onto-epistêmicas

Marcelo de Souza Bispo
article en

Abstract

In this essay, I propose a decolonial approach to Practice Theories by highlighting the epistemological and ontological blind spots of dominant Anglo-Eurocentric perspectives. While current Practice Theories have contributed to dismantling dualisms and rethinking agency, they often neglect the colonial histories, power asymmetries, and intersectional dynamics through which social practices emerge and are sustained. Exploring the analytical limitations of flat ontology reveals how the assumption of ontological symmetry can obscure the historical and geopolitical conditions of knowledge production. Rather than rejecting Practice Theories, this essay repositions them within a broader decolonial horizon by suggesting inspiration from the concepts of border and insurgent ontologies. This onto-epistemic orientation allows scholars to interrogate not only how practices unfold, but also who is authorized to practice, under what conditions, and with what consequences. I conclude with a set of guiding questions to support empirical research that embraces historicity, power relations, conflict, and epistemic diversity.

Universidade Federal da Paraíba (BR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Management and Organizational Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.