Orthodontic Bracket Removal and Enamel Roughness: Comparing the Effects of Sapphire and Metallic Brackets in an In Vitro Study

<b>Background:</b> Enamel surface roughness after bracket debonding is an important issue due to its impact on plaque accumulation and the potential development of carious lesions. This in vitro study aimed to assess enamel roughness after the removal of metallic and sapphire brackets and the effect of a remineralization treatment. <b>Methods:</b> Two hundred extracted human permanent teeth with healthy enamel were randomly distributed into two groups (<i>n</i> = 100) and bonded with either metallic or sapphire brackets using the same adhesive (3M™ Transbond™ XT (St. Paul, MN, USA), Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company, MN, USA). The enamel surface roughness was measured before bonding, after debonding, and after remineralization using SEM and a TR200 roughness (SaluTron GmbH, Frechen, Germany) tester. The parameter Ra was used to quantify the surface roughness. One-way ANOVA, the normality test, variance homogeneity, and the Bonferroni post hoc test were used to analyze the data. <b>Results:</b> Debonding significantly increased the enamel surface roughness in both groups. The sapphire bracket group presented significantly higher mean Ra values post debonding (4.14 ± 0.36 µm) compared to the metallic group (2.56 ± 0.52 µm). Remineralization led to a decrease in surface roughness in both groups, though not to baseline levels. The changes were statistically significant (<i>p</i> < 0.01), with a power of the test of 1.0. <b>Conclusions:</b> The bracket material significantly affects enamel surface roughness after orthodontic debonding. Sapphire brackets produced greater surface irregularities than metallic ones. Remineralization partially reduced roughness in both groups, with the final values in the metallic group being closer to baseline levels. Crucially, these values remained far above the clinical threshold for plaque retention, highlighting the need for improved debonding techniques.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Bioengineering
Published
2025-09-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering12101041
Primary Topic
Dental materials and restorations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Orthodontic Bracket Removal and Enamel Roughness: Comparing the Effects of Sapphire and Metallic Brackets in an In Vitro Study

Ionela Teodora Dascălu, Mihaela Jana Țuculină, Andreea Gabriela Nicola, Cristian Niky Cumpătă et al.
Bioengineering
Dental materials and restorations
article

Orthodontic Bracket Removal and Enamel Roughness: Comparing the Effects of Sapphire and Metallic Brackets in an In Vitro Study

Ionela Teodora Dascălu, Mihaela Jana Țuculină, Andreea Gabriela Nicola, Cristian Niky Cumpătă, Ioan-Ovidiu Gheorghe, Felicia Ileana Mărășescu, Adelina Smaranda Bugălă, Cosmin Mihai Mirițoiu, Petre Costin Mărăşescu, Maria Cristina Beznă, Cosmin Bogdan Licsăndroiu, Elena Verona Licsăndroiu
article en

Abstract

<b>Background:</b> Enamel surface roughness after bracket debonding is an important issue due to its impact on plaque accumulation and the potential development of carious lesions. This in vitro study aimed to assess enamel roughness after the removal of metallic and sapphire brackets and the effect of a remineralization treatment. <b>Methods:</b> Two hundred extracted human permanent teeth with healthy enamel were randomly distributed into two groups (<i>n</i> = 100) and bonded with either metallic or sapphire brackets using the same adhesive (3M™ Transbond™ XT (St. Paul, MN, USA), Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company, MN, USA). The enamel surface roughness was measured before bonding, after debonding, and after remineralization using SEM and a TR200 roughness (SaluTron GmbH, Frechen, Germany) tester. The parameter Ra was used to quantify the surface roughness. One-way ANOVA, the normality test, variance homogeneity, and the Bonferroni post hoc test were used to analyze the data. <b>Results:</b> Debonding significantly increased the enamel surface roughness in both groups. The sapphire bracket group presented significantly higher mean Ra values post debonding (4.14 ± 0.36 µm) compared to the metallic group (2.56 ± 0.52 µm). Remineralization led to a decrease in surface roughness in both groups, though not to baseline levels. The changes were statistically significant (<i>p</i> < 0.01), with a power of the test of 1.0. <b>Conclusions:</b> The bracket material significantly affects enamel surface roughness after orthodontic debonding. Sapphire brackets produced greater surface irregularities than metallic ones. Remineralization partially reduced roughness in both groups, with the final values in the metallic group being closer to baseline levels. Crucially, these values remained far above the clinical threshold for plaque retention, highlighting the need for improved debonding techniques.

BioengineeringVol. 12(10)
Titu Maiorescu University (RO), University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova (RO), Center of Technology and Engineering for Nuclear Projects (RO), University of Craiova (RO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Dental materials and restorations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.