Hemodynamic failure during sepsis: What clinicians and researchers must know

Sepsis remains the most common syndrome in intensive care units and the leading cause of mortality. This narrative review aims to synthesize the literature that should be known by most intensivists. After a brief overview of pathophysiology, this review summarizes the data on fluid resuscitation and vasopressors. The preference to use a personalized approach for fluid resuscitation and balanced fluid instead of saline was underlined, although the level of evidence remains weak. For vasopressors, innovative strategies, including an early multimodal approach, have been recently developed to overcome the excess of mortality associated with the use of high doses of norepinephrine. Future advances include an insight into the prediction of hemodynamic failure using monitoring and artificial intelligence, as well as new directions in terms of treatments targeting metabolisms and new pathways. Finally, although the literature in the field is vast, the level of evidence for most interventions is weak to moderate, but the clinical research remains intense.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Anaesthesia Critical Care & Pain Medicine
Published
2025-09-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accpm.2025.101602
Primary Topic
Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Hemodynamic failure during sepsis: What clinicians and researchers must know

Romain Pirracchio, Lene Russell, Michael Bauer, Maurizio Cecconi et al.
Anaesthesia Critical Care & Pain Medicine
Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
article

Hemodynamic failure during sepsis: What clinicians and researchers must know

Romain Pirracchio, Lene Russell, Michael Bauer, Maurizio Cecconi, Marc Léone, Ashish K. Khanna, Jordi Rello
article en

Abstract

Sepsis remains the most common syndrome in intensive care units and the leading cause of mortality. This narrative review aims to synthesize the literature that should be known by most intensivists. After a brief overview of pathophysiology, this review summarizes the data on fluid resuscitation and vasopressors. The preference to use a personalized approach for fluid resuscitation and balanced fluid instead of saline was underlined, although the level of evidence remains weak. For vasopressors, innovative strategies, including an early multimodal approach, have been recently developed to overcome the excess of mortality associated with the use of high doses of norepinephrine. Future advances include an insight into the prediction of hemodynamic failure using monitoring and artificial intelligence, as well as new directions in terms of treatments targeting metabolisms and new pathways. Finally, although the literature in the field is vast, the level of evidence for most interventions is weak to moderate, but the clinical research remains intense.

Anaesthesia Critical Care & Pain MedicineVol. 44(6)
Humanitas University (IT), University of California, San Francisco (US), Aix-Marseille Université (FR), Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ES), Gentofte Hospital (DK), Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Marseille (FR), Jena University Hospital (DE), Wake Forest University (US)
U.S. Department of Defense, Edwards Lifesciences, Bayer Corporation, Shionogi, Grifols, National Institutes of Health, Philips Research Americas
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.