Gynaecological Morbidities and Treatment-Seeking Behaviour Among Post-menopausal Women in Kerala: A Cross-Sectional Study

Background Gynaecological morbidities (GMs), including pelvic organ prolapse, urogenital infections or inflammations, benign and malignant genital tract disorders, and postmenopausal bleeding, are significant but under-recognised health concerns among postmenopausal women. Limited data are available on their prevalence and treatment-seeking behaviour in Kerala. This study aimed to estimate the prevalence of GMs, identify associated factors, and assess treatment-seeking patterns. Methods A community-based cross-sectional study was conducted in Kannur and Ernakulam districts of Kerala, representing the northern and southern regions of the state. Using multi-stage cluster sampling, 384 postmenopausal women aged 45-69 years were selected from 24 clusters. Data were collected through a pre-tested, semi-structured interview schedule covering sociodemographic characteristics, self-reported GMs, and healthcare access. Descriptive statistics were used to estimate prevalence and treatment patterns, chi-square tests assessed associations, and multivariable logistic regression identified factors independently associated with GMs. Treatment-seeking was defined as consultation with a healthcare provider, while receipt of treatment indicated initiation of medical care. Results The prevalence of GMs was 14.1% (n = 54, 95% CI: 10.9-17.8). The most commonly reported conditions were urogenital infections or inflammations (5.0%), benign genital tract disorders (5.5%), pelvic organ prolapse (2.8%), malignant genital tract disorders (0.5%), and postmenopausal bleeding (0.3%). Higher odds of GMs were observed among women aged 45-59 years (adjusted odds ratio (AOR) = 2.13, 95% CI: 1.01-4.46), those with diabetes mellitus (AOR = 2.99, 95% CI: 1.44-6.21), thyroid disorders (AOR = 4.21, 95% CI: 2.08-8.52), and early menopause (AOR = 2.20, 95% CI: 1.15-4.21). All affected women sought consultation; however, only 63.6% received treatment. Most approached private hospitals (74.1%) and gynaecologists (66.7%). Conclusion Approximately one in seven postmenopausal women reported GMs. Despite universal consultation, treatment uptake was suboptimal. Strengthening public health services, increasing awareness, and addressing barriers to care are essential to improve outcomes for this population.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cureus
Published
2025-09-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.93474
Primary Topic
Menopause: Health Impacts and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Gynaecological Morbidities and Treatment-Seeking Behaviour Among Post-menopausal Women in Kerala: A Cross-Sectional Study

Jeby Jose Olickal, P Sankara Sarma, Thilak K Theertha
Cureus
Menopause: Health Impacts and Treatments
article

Gynaecological Morbidities and Treatment-Seeking Behaviour Among Post-menopausal Women in Kerala: A Cross-Sectional Study

Jeby Jose Olickal, P Sankara Sarma, Thilak K Theertha
article en

Abstract

Background Gynaecological morbidities (GMs), including pelvic organ prolapse, urogenital infections or inflammations, benign and malignant genital tract disorders, and postmenopausal bleeding, are significant but under-recognised health concerns among postmenopausal women. Limited data are available on their prevalence and treatment-seeking behaviour in Kerala. This study aimed to estimate the prevalence of GMs, identify associated factors, and assess treatment-seeking patterns. Methods A community-based cross-sectional study was conducted in Kannur and Ernakulam districts of Kerala, representing the northern and southern regions of the state. Using multi-stage cluster sampling, 384 postmenopausal women aged 45-69 years were selected from 24 clusters. Data were collected through a pre-tested, semi-structured interview schedule covering sociodemographic characteristics, self-reported GMs, and healthcare access. Descriptive statistics were used to estimate prevalence and treatment patterns, chi-square tests assessed associations, and multivariable logistic regression identified factors independently associated with GMs. Treatment-seeking was defined as consultation with a healthcare provider, while receipt of treatment indicated initiation of medical care. Results The prevalence of GMs was 14.1% (n = 54, 95% CI: 10.9-17.8). The most commonly reported conditions were urogenital infections or inflammations (5.0%), benign genital tract disorders (5.5%), pelvic organ prolapse (2.8%), malignant genital tract disorders (0.5%), and postmenopausal bleeding (0.3%). Higher odds of GMs were observed among women aged 45-59 years (adjusted odds ratio (AOR) = 2.13, 95% CI: 1.01-4.46), those with diabetes mellitus (AOR = 2.99, 95% CI: 1.44-6.21), thyroid disorders (AOR = 4.21, 95% CI: 2.08-8.52), and early menopause (AOR = 2.20, 95% CI: 1.15-4.21). All affected women sought consultation; however, only 63.6% received treatment. Most approached private hospitals (74.1%) and gynaecologists (66.7%). Conclusion Approximately one in seven postmenopausal women reported GMs. Despite universal consultation, treatment uptake was suboptimal. Strengthening public health services, increasing awareness, and addressing barriers to care are essential to improve outcomes for this population.

CureusVol. 17(9)
Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre (IN), Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Menopause: Health Impacts and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.