PM <sub>2.5</sub> Assimilation within JEDI for NOAA's Regional Air Quality Model (AQMv7): Application to the September 2020 Western U.S. Wildfires

Abstract. This paper describes efforts to establish aerosol data assimilation capabilities for NOAA’s National Air Quality Forecasting Capability (NAQFC), a regional online air quality modeling (AQM) system under NOAA’s Unified Forecast System (UFS), by assimilating measurements of fine particulate matter (PM2.5, particles with diameters less than 2.5 µm). PM2.5 assimilation is developed within the Joint Effort for Data assimilation Integration (JEDI) framework and tested using its 3D-Var data assimilation (DA) component. The PM2.5 observation operator is constructed by combining newly developed PM2.5 transformation recipes in the JEDI Variable Derivation Repository (VADER) with a general spatial interpolation operator in the Unified Forward Operator (UFO). Cycled DA and forecast experiments were conducted from 1 to 21 September 2020, during a period of Western U.S. wildfires, to assess the impact of assimilating PM2.5 observations from the AirNow and PurpleAir networks. The control and analysis variables include individual aerosol species, with background error standard deviations generated by scaling their respective background values. Prognostic variables such as aerosol particle number and total particulate surface area are updated accordingly following each analysis update. All DA experiments use a 3-hourly cycling interval, with PM2.5 observations assimilated every 3 hours. The control experiment uses the same configuration but without any data assimilation. Results show that assimilating either AirNow or PurpleAir PM2.5 data reduces 1–24 h forecast errors in terms of mean absolute error (MAE) and root mean square error (RMSE) compared to the control run over CONUS. Forecast skill, measured using the Critical Success Index (CSI) for PM2.5 thresholds of 5, 12, and 35 µg/m³, also improves. AirNow observations have a greater impact overall, while PurpleAir shows its strongest impact over Nevada, northern Utah, Colorado, and southwestern New Mexico – regions with persistent underpredictions in the control run at forecast hour 1. Overall, the assimilation of PurpleAir observations in addition to AirNow data leads to a slight reduction in 3–24 h MAE.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-09-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-4098
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.30
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

PM 2.5 Assimilation within JEDI for NOAA's Regional Air Quality Model (AQMv7): Application to the September 2020 Western U.S. Wildfires

Hongli Wang, Youhua Tang, Jeffrey Lee, Cory Martin et al.
1 citations
Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols
1.30
article

PM 2.5 Assimilation within JEDI for NOAA's Regional Air Quality Model (AQMv7): Application to the September 2020 Western U.S. Wildfires

Hongli Wang, Youhua Tang, Jeffrey Lee, Cory Martin, Andrew Tangborn, Hyun-Deok Choi, Kai Wang, Haixia Liu, Ruifang Li, Jianping Huang, Jérôme Barré, Steve Weygandt
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract. This paper describes efforts to establish aerosol data assimilation capabilities for NOAA’s National Air Quality Forecasting Capability (NAQFC), a regional online air quality modeling (AQM) system under NOAA’s Unified Forecast System (UFS), by assimilating measurements of fine particulate matter (PM2.5, particles with diameters less than 2.5 µm). PM2.5 assimilation is developed within the Joint Effort for Data assimilation Integration (JEDI) framework and tested using its 3D-Var data assimilation (DA) component. The PM2.5 observation operator is constructed by combining newly developed PM2.5 transformation recipes in the JEDI Variable Derivation Repository (VADER) with a general spatial interpolation operator in the Unified Forward Operator (UFO). Cycled DA and forecast experiments were conducted from 1 to 21 September 2020, during a period of Western U.S. wildfires, to assess the impact of assimilating PM2.5 observations from the AirNow and PurpleAir networks. The control and analysis variables include individual aerosol species, with background error standard deviations generated by scaling their respective background values. Prognostic variables such as aerosol particle number and total particulate surface area are updated accordingly following each analysis update. All DA experiments use a 3-hourly cycling interval, with PM2.5 observations assimilated every 3 hours. The control experiment uses the same configuration but without any data assimilation. Results show that assimilating either AirNow or PurpleAir PM2.5 data reduces 1–24 h forecast errors in terms of mean absolute error (MAE) and root mean square error (RMSE) compared to the control run over CONUS. Forecast skill, measured using the Critical Success Index (CSI) for PM2.5 thresholds of 5, 12, and 35 µg/m³, also improves. AirNow observations have a greater impact overall, while PurpleAir shows its strongest impact over Nevada, northern Utah, Colorado, and southwestern New Mexico – regions with persistent underpredictions in the control run at forecast hour 1. Overall, the assimilation of PurpleAir observations in addition to AirNow data leads to a slight reduction in 3–24 h MAE.

Goddard Space Flight Center (US), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (US), Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences (US), George Mason University (US), NOAA Air Resources Laboratory (US), NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory (US), Morgan State University (US), University of Oklahoma (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols
1.30
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.