Public procurement and job quality in the Netherlands: institutions, actors and experiments

Dutch public procurement practices have led to problems with high workloads, low wages, low job autonomy and job insecurity. With reference to four sectors – construction, home care, cleaning and regional bus transport – we discuss two main explanatory dimensions: (i) the financial and institutional context; and (ii) the ideas shaping the normative and cognitive frames of actors that influence their policy-making. Procurers (a) prioritise the cheapest procurement contracts; (b) accept no, or only limited, responsibility for workers’ job quality; and (c) show limited knowledge of or at best uncertainty about how public procurement rules allow more attention to be paid to job quality and social aspects. Providers focus mainly on cost competitiveness. Finally, even dominant ideas are not shared by all, and there is (still limited) re-politicisation of job quality issues. This sometimes results in experiments that run counter to the dominant cost-efficiency objective and pay attention to job quality.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Transfer European Review of Labour and Research
Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10242589251360667
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Public Procurement and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.45

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Public procurement and job quality in the Netherlands: institutions, actors and experiments

Frank Tros, Simon Kuijpers, Maarten Keune
2 citations
Transfer European Review of Labour and Research
Public Procurement and Policy
4.45
article

Public procurement and job quality in the Netherlands: institutions, actors and experiments

Frank Tros, Simon Kuijpers, Maarten Keune
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Dutch public procurement practices have led to problems with high workloads, low wages, low job autonomy and job insecurity. With reference to four sectors – construction, home care, cleaning and regional bus transport – we discuss two main explanatory dimensions: (i) the financial and institutional context; and (ii) the ideas shaping the normative and cognitive frames of actors that influence their policy-making. Procurers (a) prioritise the cheapest procurement contracts; (b) accept no, or only limited, responsibility for workers’ job quality; and (c) show limited knowledge of or at best uncertainty about how public procurement rules allow more attention to be paid to job quality and social aspects. Providers focus mainly on cost competitiveness. Finally, even dominant ideas are not shared by all, and there is (still limited) re-politicisation of job quality issues. This sometimes results in experiments that run counter to the dominant cost-efficiency objective and pay attention to job quality.

Transfer European Review of Labour and ResearchVol. 31(2)
Utrecht University (NL), Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences (NL)
Instituut Gak
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Public Procurement and Policy
4.45
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Public procurement and job quality in the Netherlands: institutions, actors and experiments — Frank Tros, Simon Kuijpers, et al. · Transfer European Review of Labour and Research (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS