Integrating enzyme production and bioenergy recovery through circular bioprocessing of carbohydrate‐rich food wastes into <i>α</i> ‐amylase, hydrogen and methane

Abstract This study explored the valorization of two carbohydrate rich food wastes, a sugary (spoiled dates, SD) and a starchy (wasted rice, WR) one, for the biotechnological production of α ‐amylase, biohydrogen (bioH 2 ), and methane (CH 4 ). Initially, the bioH 2 and CH 4 production potentials of raw SD and WR were assessed without any pretreatment, via dark fermentation and anaerobic digestion, respectively, to evaluate the need of sacharification of the wastes for achieving efficient yields. For the production of amylolytic enzymes the bacterium Bacillus amyloliquefaciens was used. Aerobic experiments with synthetic media were initially performed to evaluate the effect of carbon and nitrogen sources on microbial growth, substrate uptake and stimulation of α ‐amylase production. Subsequently a mixture of the SD and WR, supplemented with peptone, was used as a substrate for α ‐amylase production, achieving a maximum enzymatic activity of 35.7 ± 1.1 AU mL −1 . The impact of enzymatic and acid saccharification on biofuel production was then evaluated using commercial α ‐amylases, crude α ‐amylase produced in situ by B. amyloliquefaciens , and HCl. Commercial enzymes maximized bioH 2 yields, while crude α ‐amylase also enhanced production considerably. HCl pretreatment improved WR conversion but reduced bioH 2 yields from SD. Saccharification showed only a limited effect on CH 4 production, with no statistically significant improvements over untreated WR. Overall, SD and WR show strong potential as zero‐cost feedstocks for α ‐amylase and gaseous biofuel production, supporting circular economy principles. Valorization of these carbohydrate‐rich wastes could reduce feedstock costs and provide a sustainable approach to enzyme and bioenergy generation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Biofuels Bioproducts and Biorefining
Published
2025-09-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/bbb.70055
Primary Topic
Enzyme Production and Characterization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Integrating enzyme production and bioenergy recovery through circular bioprocessing of carbohydrate‐rich food wastes into α ‐amylase, hydrogen and methane

Ιωάννα Ντάϊκου, Mohamed Hashem
Biofuels Bioproducts and Biorefining
Enzyme Production and Characterization
article

Integrating enzyme production and bioenergy recovery through circular bioprocessing of carbohydrate‐rich food wastes into α ‐amylase, hydrogen and methane

Ιωάννα Ντάϊκου, Mohamed Hashem
article en

Abstract

Abstract This study explored the valorization of two carbohydrate rich food wastes, a sugary (spoiled dates, SD) and a starchy (wasted rice, WR) one, for the biotechnological production of α ‐amylase, biohydrogen (bioH 2 ), and methane (CH 4 ). Initially, the bioH 2 and CH 4 production potentials of raw SD and WR were assessed without any pretreatment, via dark fermentation and anaerobic digestion, respectively, to evaluate the need of sacharification of the wastes for achieving efficient yields. For the production of amylolytic enzymes the bacterium Bacillus amyloliquefaciens was used. Aerobic experiments with synthetic media were initially performed to evaluate the effect of carbon and nitrogen sources on microbial growth, substrate uptake and stimulation of α ‐amylase production. Subsequently a mixture of the SD and WR, supplemented with peptone, was used as a substrate for α ‐amylase production, achieving a maximum enzymatic activity of 35.7 ± 1.1 AU mL −1 . The impact of enzymatic and acid saccharification on biofuel production was then evaluated using commercial α ‐amylases, crude α ‐amylase produced in situ by B. amyloliquefaciens , and HCl. Commercial enzymes maximized bioH 2 yields, while crude α ‐amylase also enhanced production considerably. HCl pretreatment improved WR conversion but reduced bioH 2 yields from SD. Saccharification showed only a limited effect on CH 4 production, with no statistically significant improvements over untreated WR. Overall, SD and WR show strong potential as zero‐cost feedstocks for α ‐amylase and gaseous biofuel production, supporting circular economy principles. Valorization of these carbohydrate‐rich wastes could reduce feedstock costs and provide a sustainable approach to enzyme and bioenergy generation.

Biofuels Bioproducts and BiorefiningVol. 20(1)
University of Patras (GR), FORTH Institute of Chemical Engineering Sciences (GR), Assiut University (EG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Enzyme Production and Characterization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.