Incorporating Energy Storage Costs Into Cost–Benefit Tests for Utility Demand Response Programs

ABSTRACT As global energy demand continues to rise, the strain on energy systems is intensifying. Although the widespread adoption of energy storage technologies offers a critical solution, this paper examines the pivotal role of demand response utility programs in complementing energy storage systems. Through strategic implementation, demand response programs can effectively shape energy consumption patterns, reduce costs, and enhance the integration of cleaner, renewable energy sources. Additionally, this paper contributes to the academy by demonstrating how established utility cost–benefit tests for demand response programs can incorporate energy storage costs, assessing program benefits. The findings underscore the need for further research to optimize demand response initiatives and maximize their potential within greater adoption for energy storage.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energy Storage
Published
2025-09-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/est2.70268
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Smart Grid Energy Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.73
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Incorporating Energy Storage Costs Into Cost–Benefit Tests for Utility Demand Response Programs

Ted Peterson
1 citations
Energy Storage
Smart Grid Energy Management
0.73
article

Incorporating Energy Storage Costs Into Cost–Benefit Tests for Utility Demand Response Programs

Ted Peterson
article en
1 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT As global energy demand continues to rise, the strain on energy systems is intensifying. Although the widespread adoption of energy storage technologies offers a critical solution, this paper examines the pivotal role of demand response utility programs in complementing energy storage systems. Through strategic implementation, demand response programs can effectively shape energy consumption patterns, reduce costs, and enhance the integration of cleaner, renewable energy sources. Additionally, this paper contributes to the academy by demonstrating how established utility cost–benefit tests for demand response programs can incorporate energy storage costs, assessing program benefits. The findings underscore the need for further research to optimize demand response initiatives and maximize their potential within greater adoption for energy storage.

Energy StorageVol. 7(7)
University of North Texas (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Smart Grid Energy Management
0.73
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.